Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.48

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.48.200

Remedies

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The remedies against a public nuisance are: Indictment or information, a civil action, or abatement. The remedy by indictment or information shall be as regulated and prescribed in this chapter. When a civil action for damage is resorted to, the practice shall conform to RCW 7.48.010 through 7.48.040.
[ 1957 c 51 s 12; Code 1881 s 1242; 1875 p 80 s 8; RRS s 9920.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club (2014) washctapp “2005); see also RCW 7.48.200 (providing that “[t]he remedies against a public nuisance are: Indictment or information, a civil action, or abatement”).”
Hostetler v. Ward (1985) washctapp “66, or may be the subject of civil actions by public officials or private individuals, RCW 7.48.200, .230. A private nuisance under the statute is defined more broadly than at common law, including more than just interferences with interests in land.”
ABC Holdings, Inc. v. Kittitas County (2015) washctapp “RCW 7.48.200. KCC 18.01.010(1) declares a public nuisance exists for violations of Kittitas County ordinances and codes related to, among other things, environmental health and safety.”
City of Bremerton v. Sesko (2000) washctapp “RCW 7.48.200. Both trial courts found that the nuisances on the Seskos’s properties were extensive and had existed for years and that the Seskos had made very *165 little attempt to rectify the situation.”
Heesan Corp. v. City of Lakewood (2003) washctapp “” RCW 7.48.200. “A public nuisance may be abated by any public body or officer authorized thereto by law.”
City of Bremerton v. Sesko (2000) washctapp “RCW 7.48.200. Both trial courts found that the nuisances on the Seskos's properties were extensive and had existed for years and that the Seskos had made very little attempt to rectify the situation.”
Heesan Corp. v. City of Lakewood (2003) washctapp “" RCW 7.48.200. "A public nuisance may be abated by any public body or officer authorized thereto by law.”
City of Selah v. Steve Owens and Janet Owens (2021) washctapp “RCW 7.48.200 provides: The remedies against a public nuisance are: Indictment or information, a civil action, or abatement.”
Skamania County, Res/cross-app V. Mitchell Dean Patton & Staci Lee Patton, App/cross-res (2022) washctapp “If the plaintiff secures a judgment in their favor, the plaintiff may also “have an order allowing a warrant to issue to the sheriff to abate and to deter or prevent the resumption of such nuisance.”
ABC Holdings Inc. v. Kittitas County (2015) washctapp “010(1) declares a public nuisance exists for violations of Kittitas county ordinances and codes related to, among other things, environmental health and safety. Specifically, pursuant to KCC 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.