Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.68
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.68.310 (2026)

Property subject to seizure and forfeiture

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The following are subject to seizure and forfeiture and no property right exists in them:
(1) All tangible or intangible property, including any right or interest in such property, acquired by a person convicted of a crime for which there is a victim of the crime and to the extent the acquisition is the direct or indirect result of the convicted person having committed the crime. Such property includes but is not limited to the convicted person's remuneration for, or contract interest in, any reenactment or depiction or account of the crime in a movie, book, magazine, newspaper or other publication, audio recording, radio or television presentation, live entertainment of any kind, or any expression of the convicted person's thoughts, feelings, opinions, or emotions regarding the crime.
(2) Any property acquired through the traceable proceeds of property described in subsection (1) of this section.
[ 1993 c 288 s 4.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2008 · leading case: State v. Letourneau, 997 P.2d 436 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Letourneau, 997 P.2d 436 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Letourneau was additionally sentenced to community custody for 2 years, to commence upon completion of the term of confinement, with a condition that she not receive any tangible or intangible property as defined by RCW 7.68.310 that is a direct or indirect result of her…”
State v. Letourneau, 100 Wash. App. 424 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Letourneau was additionally sentenced to community custody for two years, to commence upon completion of the term of confinement, with a condition that she not receive any tangible or intangible property as defined by RCW 7.68.310 that is a direct or indirect result of her…”
In Re Det. of Martin, 182 P.3d 951 (Wash. 2008). “320(1), "[a]ny property subject to seizure and forfeiture under RCW 7.68.310 may be seized by the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the convicted person was convicted.”
In re the Det. of Martin, 163 Wash. 2d 501 (Wash. 2008). “320(1), “[a]ny property subject to seizure and forfeiture under RCW 7.68.310 may be seized by the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the convicted person was convicted .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.