Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 71.05.026 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Except for monetary damage claims which have been reduced to final judgment by a superior court, this section applies to all claims against the state, state agencies, state officials, or state employees that exist on or arise after March 29, 2006.
(2) Except as expressly provided in contracts entered into by the authority, the entities identified in subsection (3) of this section shall have no claim for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, judicial review under chapter 34.05 RCW, or civil liability against the state or state agencies for actions or inactions performed pursuant to the administration of this chapter with regard to the following: (a) The allocation or payment of federal or state funds; (b) the use or allocation of state hospital beds; or (c) financial responsibility for the provision of inpatient behavioral health disorder treatment and care.
(3) This section applies to counties, behavioral health administrative services organizations, managed care organizations, and entities which contract to provide behavioral health services and their subcontractors, agents, or employees.
[ 2020 c 302 s 6; 2019 c 325 s 3003; 2018 c 201 s 3002; 2016 sp.s. c 29 s 206; 2014 c 225 s 81; 2006 c 333 s 301.]

Notes:

Effective date2019 c 325: See note following RCW 71.24.011.
FindingsIntentEffective date2018 c 201: See notes following RCW 41.05.018.
Effective dates2016 sp.s. c 29: See note following RCW 71.05.760.
Short titleRight of action2016 sp.s. c 29: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.
Effective date2014 c 225: See note following RCW 71.24.016.
FindingPurposeIntentSeverabilityPart headings not lawEffective dates2006 c 333: See notes following RCW 71.24.016.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Pierce Cnty. v. State, 185 P.3d 594 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 185 P.3d 594 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “333, §§ 103, 301 (codified at RCW 71.05.026 and RCW 71.24.370) (emphasis added).”
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 144 Wash. App. 783 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “333, §§ 103, 301 (emphasis added) (codified at RCW 71.05.026 and RCW 71.24.370). The legislature explained its purpose in enacting these provisions and in amending others as follows: (1) The legislature finds that ambiguities have been identified regarding the appropriation and…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 71.05.026(2) — 2 cases
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 185 P.3d 594 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “333, §§ 103, 301 (codified at RCW 71.05.026 and RCW 71.24.370) (emphasis added).”
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 144 Wash. App. 783 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “333, §§ 103, 301 (emphasis added) (codified at RCW 71.05.026 and RCW 71.24.370). The legislature explained its purpose in enacting these provisions and in amending others as follows: (1) The legislature finds that ambiguities have been identified regarding the appropriation and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.