Wash. Rev. Code § 72.04A.080
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Each inmate hereafter released on parole shall be subject to the supervision of the department of corrections, and the probation and parole officers of the department shall be charged with the preparation of progress reports of parolees and to give guidance and supervision to such parolees within the conditions of a parolee's release from custody. Copies of all progress reports prepared by the probation and parole officers shall be supplied to the *board of prison terms and paroles for their files and records.
Notes:
*Reviser's note: The "board of prison terms and paroles" was redesignated the "indeterminate sentence review board" by 1986 c 224, effective July 1, 1986.
Effective date—1981 c 136: See RCW 72.09.900.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: Taggart v. State
Taggart v. State (1992)
“Under RCW 72.04A.080, parolees "shall be subject to the supervision of the department of corrections, and the probation and parole officers of the department shall be charged with the preparation of progress reports of parolees and to give guidance and supervision to such…”
Sheikh v. Choe (2006)
“giv[ing] guidance and supervision to such parolees within the conditions of a parolee's release from custody.”
State v. Fain (1980)
“RCW 72.04A.080,.090; RCW 9.95.120, .125. Finally, our cases and the foregoing statutory scheme reveal that Fain's chances of receiving parole have little to do with the crimes for which he was sentenced.”
Couch v. Department of Corrections (2002)
“35 RCW 72.04A.080 36 mandated that the parole officer supervise “within the conditions of a parolee’s release from custody.”
Aba Sheikh v. Choe (2006)
“080, which states that parolees “ ‘shall be subject to the supervision of the department of corrections, and the probation and parole officers of the department shall be charged with . . . giv[ing] guidance and supervision to such parolees within the conditions of a parolee’s…”
Joyce v. State, Dept. of Corrections (2005)
“634 (community supervision) with RCW 72.04A.080 (parole). In each, the government has assumed the duty of supervising an offender's conduct.”
Joyce v. Department of Corrections (2005)
“634 (community supervision) with RCW 72.04A.080 (parole). In each, the government has assumed the duty of supervising an offender’s conduct.”
Hertog v. City of Seattle (1999)
“This relationship exists between a parole officer and his or her parolees as a result of RCW 72.04A.080, which provides that parolees are subject to supervision by the Department of Corrections and that parole officers are charged with preparing progress reports and guiding and…”
HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle (1999)
“This relationship exists between a parole officer and his or her parolees as a result of RCW 72.04A.080, which provides that parolees are subject to supervision by the Department of Corrections and that parole officers are charged with preparing progress reports and guiding and…”
Couch v. Wa. Dep't of Corrections (2002)
“[35] RCW 72.04A.080 [36] mandated that the parole officer supervise "within the conditions of a parolee's release from custody.”
Husted v. State (2015)
“The court determined that such a relationship existed between parole officers and parolees based on RCW 72.04A.080, which states that parolees “ ‘shall be subject to the supervision of the department of corrections, and the probation and parole officer of the department shall be…”
McKenna v. Edwards (1992)
“RCW 72.04A.080. The parole officers were required to "give .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.