Wash. Rev. Code » Title 74 · Chapter 74.09

Wash. Rev. Code § 74.09.220

Liability for receipt of excess payments

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person, firm, corporation, partnership, association, agency, institution or other legal entity, but not including an individual public assistance recipient of health care, that, without intent to violate this chapter or other applicable law, obtains benefits or payments under this code to which such person or entity is not entitled, or in a greater amount than that to which entitled, shall be liable for (1) any excess benefits or payments received, and (2) interest calculated at the rate and in the manner provided in RCW 43.20B.695 or 41.05A.220. Whenever a penalty is due under RCW 74.09.210 or interest is due under RCW 43.20B.695 or 41.05A.220, such penalty or interest shall not be reimbursable by the state as an allowable cost under any of the provisions of this chapter or other applicable law.
[ 2023 c 51 s 37; 2018 c 201 s 7010; 1987 c 283 s 8; 1979 ex.s. c 152 s 3.]

Notes:

Findings—Intent—Effective date—2018 c 201: See notes following RCW 41.05.018.
Severability—Savings—1987 c 283: See notes following RCW 43.20A.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: Harold Bircumshaw v. State Of Washington, Health Care Authority
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harold Bircumshaw v. State Of Washington, Health Care Authority (2016) washctapp “RCW 74.09.220. As defined in RCW 43.20B.010(5), “any payment or benefit to a recipient or to a vendor in excess of *190 that to which [it] is entitled by law, rule, or contract, including amounts in dispute,” is an “overpayment.”
Allen Dental Laboratories, Inc., App v. Washington State Health Care Authority, Resp (2017) washctapp “15 We examine the provisions in the context of "'the contract as a whole, interpreting particular language in the context of other contract provisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.