Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 8.04.130 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon the entry of judgment upon the verdict of the jury or the decision of the court awarding damages, the state may make payment of the damages and the costs of the proceedings by depositing them with the clerk of the court, to be paid out under the direction of the court or judge thereof; and upon making such payment into court of the damages assessed and allowed for any land, real estate, premises, or other property mentioned in the petition, and of the costs, the state shall be released and discharged from any and all further liability therefor, unless upon appeal the owner or party interested recovers a greater amount of damages; and in that case the state shall be liable only for the amount in excess of the sum paid into court and the costs of appeal.
In the event appellate review is sought by any party to the proceedings, the moneys paid into the superior court by the state pursuant to this section shall remain in the custody of the court until the final determination of the proceedings by the supreme court or the court of appeals.
[ 1988 c 202 s 7; 1971 c 81 s 35; 1951 c 177 s 4; 1925 ex.s. c 98 s 3; 1891 c 74 s 7; RRS s 897.]

Notes:

Severability1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1956–2003 · leading case: State v. Trask, 91 Wash. App. 253 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Trask, 91 Wash. App. 253 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “The State bases this argument on RCW 8.04.130 and RCW 8.04.150. 13 RCW 8.04.”
State v. Costich, 117 Wash. App. 491 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “RCW 8.04.130. But, if the court erroneously releases the funds, nothing in the statute penalizes the landowner by foreclosing his right to appeal issues unrelated to the amount of the award.”
State v. Trask, 957 P.2d 781 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “The State bases this argument on RCW 8.04.130 and RCW 8.04.150. [13] RCW 8.”
State v. Farmers Union Grain Co., 908 P.2d 386 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). “RCW 8.04.130. Allocation of the condemnation award, however, generally involves a two-step process: (1) the court or jury determines a lump-sum condemnation award for the value of the premises taken, and (2) *293 the award is distributed to the claimants.”
State v. Costich, 72 P.3d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “Another section of the statute requires that, once an appeal is filed by either party, all moneys paid into the registry of the court must remain in the custody of the court until after the appeal is decided.”
State v. Smithrock Quarry, Inc., 304 P.2d 1043 (Wash. 1956). “The appellant relies upon RCW 8.04.130 and RCW 8.04.150 [cf. Rem. Rev.”
State v. Wachsmith, 479 P.2d 943 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971). “150 reading as follows: Provided further, That no appeal shall operate so as to prevent the said state of Washington from taking possession of such property pending such appeal after the amount of said award shall have been paid into court. We disagree. In this case, respondents…”
State v. Calkins, 342 P.2d 620 (Wash. 1959). · cites it 2× “RCW 8.04.130 provides, in part: "In the event of an appeal to the supreme court of the state by any party to the proceedings, the moneys paid into the superior court by the state pursuant to this section shall remain in the custody of the court until the final determination of…”
State v. Sternoff, 392 P.2d 222 (Wash. 1964). · cites it 3× “This motion is predicated upon the fact that appellants withdrew from the registry of the court the *468 amount adjudged and deposited as just compensation for the appropriation of their 14 acres, coupled with the provisions of RCW 8.04.130 and 8.04.150, which read: “Upon the…”
State v. Higgins, 449 P.2d 393 (Wash. 1969). · cites it 2× “RCW 8.04.130 provides in part: Upon the entry of judgment upon the verdict of the jury or the decision of the court awarding damages, the state may make payment of the damages and the costs of the proceedings by depositing them with the clerk of the court, to be paid out under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.