Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.32.210 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) If any fee, tax, increase, or penalty or any portion thereof is not paid within fifteen days after it becomes due, the department may issue a warrant in the amount of the unpaid sums, together with interest thereon from the date the warrant is issued until the date of payment. If, however, the department believes that a taxpayer is about to cease business, leave the state, or remove or dissipate the assets out of which fees, taxes or penalties might be satisfied and that any tax or penalty will not be paid when due, it may declare the fee, tax or penalty to be immediately due and payable and may issue a warrant immediately.
(a) Interest imposed before January 1, 1999, is computed at the rate of one percent of the amount of the warrant for each thirty days or portion thereof.
(b) Interest imposed after December 31, 1998, is computed on a daily basis on the amount of outstanding tax or fee at the rate as computed under RCW 82.32.050(2). The rate so computed must be adjusted on the first day of January of each year for use in computing interest for that calendar year. As used in this subsection, "fee" does not include an administrative filing fee such as a court filing fee and warrant fee.
(2) Except as provided in RCW 82.32.212, the department must file a copy of the warrant with the clerk of the superior court of any county of the state in which real and/or personal property of the taxpayer may be found. The clerk is entitled to a filing fee under RCW 36.18.012(10). Upon filing, the clerk will enter in the judgment docket, the name of the taxpayer mentioned in the warrant and in appropriate columns the amount of the fee, tax or portion thereof and any increases and penalties for which the warrant is issued and the date when the copy is filed. The amount of the warrant so docketed is a specific lien upon all goods, wares, merchandise, fixtures, equipment, or other personal property used in the conduct of the business of the taxpayer against whom the warrant is issued, including property owned by third persons who have a beneficial interest, direct or indirect, in the operation of the business, and no sale or transfer of the personal property in any way affects the lien.
(3) The lien is not superior, however, to bona fide interests of third persons that vested before the filing of the warrant when the third persons do not have a beneficial interest, direct or indirect, in the operation of the business, other than to secure payment of a debt or to receive a regular rental on equipment. The phrase "bona fide interests of third persons" does not include any mortgage of real or personal property or any other credit transaction that results in the mortgagee or the holder of the security acting as trustee for unsecured creditors of the taxpayer mentioned in the warrant who executed the chattel or real property mortgage or the document evidencing the credit transaction.
(4) The amount of the warrant so docketed is also a lien upon the title to and interest in all other real and personal property of the taxpayer against whom it is issued the same as a judgment in a civil case duly docketed in the office of the clerk. The warrant so docketed is sufficient to support the issuance of writs of garnishment in favor of the state as provided by law for judgments wholly or partially unsatisfied.
[ 2011 c 131 s 1; 2001 c 146 s 12; 1998 c 311 s 8; 1997 c 157 s 3; 1987 c 405 s 15; 1983 1st ex.s. c 55 s 8; 1967 ex.s. c 89 s 3; 1961 c 15 s 82.32.210. Prior: 1955 c 389 s 38; prior: 1951 1st ex.s. c 9 s 13; 1949 c 228 s 225, part; 1937 c 227 s 20, part; 1935 c 180 s 202, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 8370-202, part.]
Notes:
Effective date—2011 c 131: See note following RCW 82.32.212.
Severability—1987 c 405: See note following RCW 70A.15.3500.
Effective dates—1983 1st ex.s. c 55: See note following RCW 82.08.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1956–2024 · leading case: Peters v. Sjoholm, 631 P.2d 937 (Wash. 1981).
Peters v. Sjoholm, 631 P.2d 937 (Wash. 1981). “Following an audit of petitioner Gene Peters' business, the Department found him delinquent in his excise taxes in the amount of $1,505.14. The Department issued a tax assessment for the delinquency and mailed a copy to petitioner.”
In Re Doherty, 229 B.R. 461 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1999). “The Department of Revenue is proceeding under RCW 82.32.210 which allows it to file a warrant for unpaid taxes with the Superior Court.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue for State, 14 P.3d 902 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “It also results in a lien against all other real and personal property of the taxpayer, "the same as a judgment in a civil case duly docketed in the office of the clerk.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue, 104 Wash. App. 87 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “Under the tax warrant statute, RCW 82.32.210, the filing of a tax warrant with the superior court results in a perfected lien against all business personal property upon filing.”
Kirkland v. Dep't of Revenue, 727 P.2d 254 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986). “Kirkland's conclusory allegations of full payment are without legal significance, and thus fail to raise a material issue of fact. B Due Process The Department also contends summary judgment should have been granted because Kirkland's procedural due process challenge to RCW 82.”
State v. Hi-Lo Foods, Inc., 383 P.2d 910 (Wash. 1963). “Warrants for the collection of these taxes were issued by the State Tax Commission (RCW 82.32.210) and filed by the Sheriff of Pierce County with the Clerk of Court on January 12, 1959, and February 10, 1959.”
Peters v. Sjoholm, 604 P.2d 527 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “When he failed to remit the amount assessed, the department issued a tax warrant against him, commanding an agent of the department (1) to file a copy with an appropriate county clerk and (2) to levy upon personal property of the taxpayer.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Nat'l Indem. Co., 723 P.2d 1187 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986). “See RCW 82.32.210; RCW 50.24.040. The stay orders of the Superior Court are reversed.”
Weitz v. Electrovation, Inc., 295 P.2d 728 (Wash. 1956). “220, the pertinent portions of which are as follows: RCW 82.32.210 “If any tax, increase, or penalty or any portion thereof is not paid within fifteen days after it becomes due, the tax commission may issue a warrant under its official seal directed to the sheriff of any county…”
Wood v. Cantwell (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2024). “12 On February 9, 2022, pursuant to RCW 82.32.210, the DOR issued a tax warrant against 13 Emeral asserting B&O and collected but unremitted sales taxes totaling $182,973.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.32.210(2) — 3 cases
In Re Doherty, 229 B.R. 461 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1999). “The Department of Revenue is proceeding under RCW 82.32.210 which allows it to file a warrant for unpaid taxes with the Superior Court.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue for State, 14 P.3d 902 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “It also results in a lien against all other real and personal property of the taxpayer, "the same as a judgment in a civil case duly docketed in the office of the clerk.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue, 104 Wash. App. 87 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “Under the tax warrant statute, RCW 82.32.210, the filing of a tax warrant with the superior court results in a perfected lien against all business personal property upon filing.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.32.210(4) — 3 cases
In Re Doherty, 229 B.R. 461 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1999). “The Department of Revenue is proceeding under RCW 82.32.210 which allows it to file a warrant for unpaid taxes with the Superior Court.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue for State, 14 P.3d 902 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “It also results in a lien against all other real and personal property of the taxpayer, "the same as a judgment in a civil case duly docketed in the office of the clerk.”
Summers v. Dep't of Revenue, 104 Wash. App. 87 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “Under the tax warrant statute, RCW 82.32.210, the filing of a tax warrant with the superior court results in a perfected lien against all business personal property upon filing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.