Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 90.03.310 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any permit to appropriate water may be assigned subject to the conditions of the permit, but no such assignment shall be binding or valid unless filed for record with the department. Any application for permits to appropriate water prior to permit issuing, may be assigned by the applicant, but no such assignment shall be valid or binding unless the written consent of the department is first obtained thereto, and unless such assignment is filed for record with the department.

[ 1987 c 109 s 88; 1917 c 117 s 32; RRS s 7384. Prior: 1891 c 142 s 6. Formerly RCW 90.20.080.]

Notes:

Purpose—Short title—Construction—Rules—Severability—Captions—1987 c 109: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Hanson Indus., Inc. v. Kutschkau, 158 Wash. App. 278 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hanson Indus., Inc. v. Kutschkau, 158 Wash. App. 278 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Lamb Weston argues that the declarations were necessary to respond to Hanson’s arguments relating to RCW 90.03.310. In the trial court, Lamb Weston argued that the declarations were necessary to show the Department’s practice and interpretation of the law.”

Hanson Indus. Inc. v. Kutschkau, 239 P.3d 367 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “¶ 41 Lamb Weston also contends that the court abused its discretion by striking the declarations of Mr.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.