Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 227.112 (2026)
Guidance documents
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
227.112(1)(a)(a) Before adopting a guidance document, an agency shall submit to the legislative reference bureau the proposed guidance document with a notice of a public comment period on the proposed guidance document under par. (b), in a format approved by the legislative reference bureau, for publication in the register. The notice shall specify the place where comments should be submitted and the deadline for submitting those comments.
227.112(1)(b)(b) The agency shall provide for a period for public comment on a proposed guidance document submitted under par. (a), during which any person may submit written comments to the agency with respect to the proposed guidance document. Except as provided in par. (c), the period for public comment shall end no sooner than the 21st day after the date on which the proposed guidance document is published in the register under s. 35.93 (2) (b) 3. im. The agency may not adopt the proposed guidance document until the comment period has concluded and the agency has complied with par. (d).
227.112(1)(c)(c) An agency may hold a public comment period shorter than 21 days with the approval of the governor.
227.112(1)(d)(d) An agency shall retain all written comments submitted during the public comment period under par. (b) and shall consider those comments in determining whether to adopt the guidance document as originally proposed, modify the proposed guidance document, or take any other action.
227.112(2)(2) An agency shall post each guidance document that the agency has adopted on the agency’s Internet site and shall permit continuing public comment on the guidance document. The agency shall ensure that each guidance document that the agency has adopted remains on the agency’s Internet site as provided in this subsection until the guidance document is no longer in effect, is no longer valid, or is superseded or until the agency otherwise rescinds its adoption of the guidance document.
227.112(3)(3) A guidance document does not have the force of law and does not provide the authority for implementing or enforcing a standard, requirement, or threshold, including as a term or condition of any license. An agency that proposes to rely on a guidance document to the detriment of a person in any proceeding shall afford the person an adequate opportunity to contest the legality or wisdom of a position taken in the guidance document. An agency may not use a guidance document to foreclose consideration of any issue raised in the guidance document.
227.112(4)(4) If an agency proposes to act in any proceeding at variance with a position expressed in a guidance document, it shall provide a reasonable explanation for the variance. If an affected person in any proceeding may have relied reasonably on the agency’s position, the explanation must include a reasonable justification for the agency’s conclusion that the need for the variance outweighs the affected person’s reliance interest.
227.112(5)(5) Persons that qualify under s. 227.12 to petition an agency to promulgate a rule may, as provided in s. 227.12, petition an agency to promulgate a rule in place of a guidance document.
227.112(6)(6) Any guidance document shall be signed by the secretary or head of the agency below the following certification: “I have reviewed this guidance document or proposed guidance document and I certify that it complies with sections 227.10 and 227.11 of the Wisconsin Statutes. I further certify that the guidance document or proposed guidance document contains no standard, requirement, or threshold that is not explicitly required or explicitly permitted by a statute or a rule that has been lawfully promulgated. I further certify that the guidance document or proposed guidance document contains no standard, requirement, or threshold that is more restrictive than a standard, requirement, or threshold contained in the Wisconsin Statutes.”
227.112(7)(a)(a) This section does not apply to guidance documents adopted before July 1, 2019, but on that date any guidance document that has not been adopted in accordance with sub. (1) or that does not contain the certification required under sub. (6) shall be considered rescinded.
227.112(7)(b)(b) This section does not apply to guidance documents or proposed guidance documents of the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical College System Board, or the department of employee trust funds.
227.112(8)(8) The legislative council staff shall provide agencies with assistance in determining whether documents and communications are guidance documents that are subject to the requirements under this section.
227.112 NoteNOTE: In Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Vos, 2020 WI 67, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that this section is facially unconstitutional.
227.112 AnnotationThe legislature may enact the laws the executive is duty-bound to execute, but it may not control the executive’s knowledge or intentions about those laws. Nor may the legislature mute or modulate the communication of the executive’s knowledge or intentions to the public. Because there was no set of facts pursuant to which this section and s. 227.05, to the extent it applied to guidance documents, would not impermissibly interfere with the executive’s exercise of core constitutional power, they were in that respect facially unconstitutional. Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Vos, 2020 WI 67, 393 Wis. 2d 38, 946 N.W.2d 35, 19-0614.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022).
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022). “" Wis. Stat. § 227.112 (3) (2019–20).1 Despite the constitutional vesting of lawmaking power in the legislature,2 Trump requires us to uphold documents produced by executive-branch employees, notwithstanding their inconsistency with the plain meaning of the statutes WEC…”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. Biden, 2020 WI 91 (Wis. 2020). “" Wis. Stat. § 227.112 (3). WEC's guidance documents are merely "communications about the law——they are not the law itself.”
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2025 WI 26 (Wis. 2025). “§ 227.112(1)(a)–(b). If this procedure is not properly complied with, a regulated party can challenge the resulting guidance document and have it declared invalid.”
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022). “" Wis. Stat. § 227.112 (3) (2019–20).1 Despite the constitutional vesting of lawmaking power in the legislature,2 Trump requires us to uphold documents produced by executive-branch employees, notwithstanding their inconsistency with the plain meaning of the statutes WEC…”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. Biden, 2020 WI 91 (Wis. 2020). “" Wis. Stat. § 227.112 (3). WEC's guidance documents are merely "communications about the law——they are not the law itself.”
Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue v. Deere & Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 227.112)). ¶48 In reviewing the constitutionality of these provisions, the court identified the “creation and dissemination of [agency] guidance documents” as part of “the executive’s core authority,” and then made the statement that the Department now quotes, noted above.”
Rise, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2024 WI App 48 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 227.112(3), “[a] guidance document does not have the force of law and does not provide the authority for implementing or enforcing a standard, requirement, or threshold.”
— Wis. Stat. § 227.112(1)(a) — 1 case
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2025 WI 26 (Wis. 2025). “§ 227.112(1)(a)–(b). If this procedure is not properly complied with, a regulated party can challenge the resulting guidance document and have it declared invalid.”
— Wis. Stat. § 227.112(3) — 5 cases
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Serv. Employees Int'l Union (SEIU), Local 1 v. Robin Vos, 2020 WI 67 (Wis. 2020). “05 ); § 38 ( Wis. Stat. § 227.112 ); § 64 ( Wis. Stat.”
Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue v. Deere & Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 227.112)). ¶48 In reviewing the constitutionality of these provisions, the court identified the “creation and dissemination of [agency] guidance documents” as part of “the executive’s core authority,” and then made the statement that the Department now quotes, noted above.”
Rise, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2024 WI App 48 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 227.112(3), “[a] guidance document does not have the force of law and does not provide the authority for implementing or enforcing a standard, requirement, or threshold.”
— Wis. Stat. § 227.112(4) — 1 case
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2025 WI 26 (Wis. 2025). “§ 227.112(1)(a)–(b). If this procedure is not properly complied with, a regulated party can challenge the resulting guidance document and have it declared invalid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.