Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 242.10 (2026)

Supplementary provisions

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

242.10242.10 Supplementary provisions. Unless displaced by this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement this chapter.

242.10 HistoryHistory: 1987 a. 192.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1944–2016 · leading case: Badger State Bank v. Taylor, 2004 WI 128 (Wis. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Badger State Bank v. Taylor, 2004 WI 128 (Wis. 2004). · cites it 2× “The fallacy in this argument is that the Taylors are looking at the transactions as involving only two parties (the Taylors and A1 Vogt), rather than as involving three or four parties (the Taylors, A1 Vogt, Ag-Tech, and A&T Livestock). By treating the transactions as involving…”

Weintraut v. Comm'r, 2016 T.C. Memo. 142 (Tax Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “10 ; and (4) the Indiana Supreme Court would, and therefore we should, look to certain equitable principles in determining whether for purposes of the Indiana UFTA in substance FFI made a distribution or transfer of its property to each of the FFI stockholders in the SPR sale…”

C & A Investments v. Kelly, 2010 WI App 151 (Wis. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “In fact, Wis. Stat. § 242.10 states, "Unless displaced by this chapter, the principles of law and equity.”

Shockley v. Comm'r, 2015 T.C. Memo. 113 (2015). · cites it 2× “The Court of Appeals instructed that "Wisconsin has long followed the general rule that '[e]quity looks to substance and not to form'" and noted that WIUFTA explicitly incorporates equitable principles under section 242.”

Angers v. Sabatinelli, 18 N.W.2d 705 (Wis. 1944). “It is con *385 sidered that the trial court properly proceeded with the trial on the theory that this was an action under the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, authorized by sec. 242.10, Stats., which provides: “Where a conveyance made or obligation incurred is fraudulent as to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.