Wis. Stat. § 66.0907
Sidewalks
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
66.0907(1)(1) Part of street; obstructions. Streets shall provide a right-of-way for vehicular traffic and, where the council requires, a sidewalk on either or both sides of the street. The sidewalk shall be for the use of persons on foot, and no person may encumber the sidewalk with boxes or other material. The sidewalk shall be kept clear for the use of persons on foot.
66.0907(2)(2) Grade. If the grades of sidewalks are not specially fixed by ordinance, the sidewalks shall be laid to the established grade of the street.
66.0907(3)(a)(a) Authority of council. The council may by ordinance or resolution determine where sidewalks shall be constructed and establish the width, determine the material and prescribe the method of construction of standard sidewalks. The standard may be different for different streets. The council may order by ordinance or resolution sidewalks to be laid as provided in this subsection.
66.0907(3)(b)(b) Board of public works. The board of public works may order any sidewalk which is unsafe, defective or insufficient to be repaired or removed and replaced with a sidewalk in accordance with the standard fixed by the council.
66.0907(3)(c)(c) Notice. A copy of the ordinance, resolution or order directing the laying, removal, replacement or repair of sidewalks shall be served upon the owner, or an agent, of each lot or parcel of land in front of which the work is ordered. The board of public works, or either the street commissioner or the city engineer if so requested by the council, may serve the notice. Service of the notice may be made by any of the following methods:
66.0907(3)(c)3.3. Publication in the official newspaper as a class 1 notice, under ch. 985, together with mailing by 1st class mail if the name and mailing address of the owner or an agent can be readily ascertained.
66.0907(3)(d)(d) Default of owner. If the owner neglects for a period of 20 days after service of notice under par. (c) to lay, remove, replace or repair the sidewalk the city may cause the work to be done at the expense of the owner. All work for the construction of sidewalks shall be let by contract to the lowest responsible bidder except as provided in s. 62.15 (1).
66.0907(3)(e)(e) Minor repairs. If the cost of repairs of any sidewalk in front of any lot or parcel of land does not exceed the sum of $100, the board of public works, street commissioner or city engineer, if so required by the council, may immediately repair the sidewalk, without notice, and charge the cost of the repair to the owner of the lot or parcel of land, as provided in this section.
66.0907(3)(f)(f) Expense. The board of public works shall keep an accurate account of the expenses of laying, removing and repairing sidewalks in front of each lot or parcel of land, whether the work is done by contract or otherwise, and report the expenses to the comptroller. The comptroller shall annually prepare a statement of the expense incurred in front of each lot or parcel of land and report the amount to the city clerk. The amount charged to each lot or parcel of land shall be entered by the clerk in the tax roll as a special charge, as defined under s. 74.01 (4), against the lot or parcel of land and collected like other taxes upon real estate. The council by resolution or ordinance may provide that the expense incurred may be paid in up to 10 annual installments and the comptroller shall prepare the expense statement to reflect the installment payment schedule. If annual installments for sidewalk expenses are authorized, the city clerk shall charge the amount to each lot or parcel of land and enter it on the tax roll as a special charge, as defined under s. 74.01 (4), against the lot or parcel each year until all installments have been entered, and the amount shall be collected like other taxes upon real estate. The council may provide that the street commissioner or city engineer perform the duties imposed by this section on the board of public works.
66.0907(5)(5) Snow and ice. The board of public works shall keep the sidewalks of the city clear of snow and ice in all cases where the owners or occupants of abutting lots fail to do so, and the expense of clearing in front of any lot or parcel of land shall be included in the statement to the comptroller required by sub. (3) (f), in the comptroller’s statement to the city clerk and in the special tax to be levied. The city may also impose a fine or penalty for neglecting to keep sidewalks clear of snow and ice.
66.0907(6)(6) Repair at city expense. The council may provide that sidewalks shall be kept in repair by and at the expense of the city or may direct that a certain proportion of the cost of construction, reconstruction or repair be paid by the city and the balance by abutting property owners.
66.0907(7)(7) Rules. The council may by ordinance implement the provisions of this section, regulate the use of the sidewalks of the city and prevent their obstruction.
66.0907(10)(10) Application of section; definitions. The provisions of this section do not apply to 1st class cities but apply to towns and villages, and when applied to towns and villages:
66.0907(10)(a)(a) “Board of public works” means the committee or officer designated to handle street or sidewalk matters.
66.0907 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 172, 356, 421, 422; 1979 c. 32; 1983 a. 189, 532; 1991 a. 316; 1993 a. 490; 1999 a. 150 s. 542; Stats. 1999 s. 66.0907; 2015 a. 55.
66.0907 AnnotationA city cannot delegate its primary responsibility to maintain its sidewalks, nor delegate or limit its primary liability by ordinance. Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp., 56 Wis. 2d 504, 202 N.W.2d 415 (1972).
66.0907 AnnotationThe property owners’ failure to remove snow and ice from sidewalks in violation of a municipal ordinance did not constitute negligence per se. Hagerty v. Village of Bruce, 82 Wis. 2d 208, 262 N.W.2d 102 (1978).
66.0907 AnnotationA city, exercising its police power, can impose a special tax on properties for the cost of installing a sidewalk on an adjacent city right-of-way without showing that the properties would be benefited. Stehling v. City of Beaver Dam, 114 Wis. 2d 197, 336 N.W.2d 401 (Ct. App. 1983).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
Genrich v. City of Rice Lake (2003)
“See Wis. Stat. § 66.0907 (3)(f); 6 see also Stehling v.”
Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual Insurance (2001)
“2d 130 (1956); Wis. Stat. § 66.0907 . We emphasize again that the liability of the Frankes on the present facts is in no way premised on their failure to maintain the "streets, highways and related signage" adjacent to their home, but on their failure to eliminate a safety…”
Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg Harbor (2024)
“§ 66.0907 (1). Were the majority correct, then a sidewalk could never be a walk designated for pedestrian travel.”
Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg Harbor (2024)
“§ 66.0907 (1). Were the majority correct, then a sidewalk could never be a walk designated for pedestrian travel.”
Vicki Pfeifer v. Secura Insurance a Mutual Company (2024)
“§ 66.0907 ¶37 Ellenbecker’s next argument is that WIS.”
Cari Ullrich v. City of Neenah (2022)
“The appellants appeal from orders of the circuit court denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the City of Neenah’s motion for summary judgment.”
Joan Scalcucci v. County of Dane (2021)
“§ 66.0907, the statute governing town and village sidewalks, and to the Madison Ordinance adopting that statute.”
Hildebrand v. Town of Menasha (2011)
“See Wis. Stat. § 66.0907 (3)(f). The Town cannot have it both ways.”
Janice A. Klika v. City of Green Bay (2022)
“For our purposes, we will assume without deciding that the City had a duty to safely maintain the sidewalk at issue because, again, our analysis of whether governmental immunity applies in this instance assumes that the City was negligent.”
Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg Harbor (2023)
“§ 66.0907(1) (“[A] sidewalk [may be placed] on either or both sides of [a] street.”
— Wis. Stat. § 66.0907(1) — 6 cases
Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg Harbor (2024)
“§ 66.0907 (1). Were the majority correct, then a sidewalk could never be a walk designated for pedestrian travel.”
Sojenhomer LLC v. Village of Egg Harbor (2024)
“§ 66.0907 (1). Were the majority correct, then a sidewalk could never be a walk designated for pedestrian travel.”
Vicki Pfeifer v. Secura Insurance a Mutual Company (2024)
“§ 66.0907 ¶37 Ellenbecker’s next argument is that WIS.”
Cari Ullrich v. City of Neenah (2022)
“The appellants appeal from orders of the circuit court denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the City of Neenah’s motion for summary judgment.”
Joan Scalcucci v. County of Dane (2021)
“§ 66.0907, the statute governing town and village sidewalks, and to the Madison Ordinance adopting that statute.”
— Wis. Stat. § 66.0907(3)(f) — 1 case
Genrich v. City of Rice Lake (2003)
“See Wis. Stat. § 66.0907 (3)(f); 6 see also Stehling v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.