Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (2026)
Rendition, perfection and entry of judgment
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
806.06(1)(a)(a) A judgment is rendered by the court when it is signed by the judge or by the clerk at the judge’s written direction.
806.06(1)(c)(c) A judgment is perfected by the taxation of costs and the insertion of the amount thereof in the judgment.
806.06(2)(2) The judge or the clerk upon the written order of the judge may sign the judgment. The judgment shall be entered by the clerk upon rendition.
806.06(3)(3) After an order or judgment is entered, either party may serve upon the other a written notice of entry containing the date of entry.
806.06(4)(4) A judgment may be rendered and entered at the instance of any party either before or after perfection. If the party in whose favor the judgment is rendered causes it to be entered, the party shall perfect the judgment within 30 days of entry or forfeit the right to recover costs. If the party against whom the judgment is rendered causes it to be entered, the party in whose favor the judgment is rendered shall perfect it within 30 days of service of notice of entry of judgment or forfeit the right to recover costs. If proceedings are stayed under s. 806.08, judgment may be perfected at any time within 30 days after the expiration of the stay. If the parties agree to settle all issues but fail to file a notice of dismissal, the judge may direct the clerk to draft an order dismissing the action. No execution shall issue until the judgment is perfected or until the expiration of the time for perfection, unless the party seeking execution shall file a written waiver of entitlement to costs.
806.06(5)(5) Notice of entry of judgment or order must be given within 21 days after the entry of judgment or order to constitute notice under s. 808.04 (1).
806.06 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 724 (1975); 1975 c. 218; Sup. Ct. Order, 83 Wis. 2d xiii (1978); Sup. Ct. Order, 92 Wis. 2d xiii (1979); Sup. Ct. Order, 104 Wis. 2d xi (1981).
806.06 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1979: Sub. (5) is amended by adding a reference to the entry of an order so as to conform with s. 808.04 (1), which establishes appeal time periods from the entry of a judgment “or” order. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1980]
806.06 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1981: Subs. (3) and (5) are amended to clarify what constitutes a sufficient notice of entry to reduce the appeal time. The notice of entry must be a written document, other than the judgment or order, containing the date of entry and served after the entry of the judgment or order. The notice must accurately and completely inform the opposing party as to the date of entry. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1982]
806.06 AnnotationNotice of entry of judgment was “given” within the meaning of sub. (5) when it was mailed. Section 801.15 (5) was inapplicable. Bruns v. Muniz, 97 Wis. 2d 742, 295 N.W.2d 11 (Ct. App. 1980).
806.06 AnnotationThe last document in litigation should indicate on its face that for purposes of appeal it is a final order or judgment and that no subsequent document is contemplated. Radoff v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 109 Wis. 2d 490, 326 N.W.2d 240 (1982).
806.06 AnnotationUnder s. 808.04 (1), notice of entry of judgment must be given within 21 days of the entry of judgment, not of signing, consistent with sub. (5). Linnmar, Inc. v. First Enterprises, Inc., 161 Wis. 2d 706, 468 N.W.2d 753 (Ct. App. 1991).
806.06 AnnotationSub. (4) governs the timeliness of an application for attorney fees in a federal civil rights action. Hartman v. Winnebago County, 216 Wis. 2d 419, 574 N.W.2d 222 (1998), 96-0596.
806.06 AnnotationNo statute authorizes a clerk of court’s office to correct a clerical error in the sentence portion of a judgment of conviction. The circuit court, and not the clerk’s office, must determine the merits of a request for a change in the sentence portion of a written judgment because of an alleged clerical error. State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123, 239 Wis. 2d 244, 618 N.W.2d 857, 98-2263.
806.06 AnnotationAn action to enforce a contractual agreement to pay attorney fees in the event of a suit between the parties to the contract was subject to the time limit under sub. (4). Purdy v. Cap Gemini America, Inc., 2001 WI App 270, 248 Wis. 2d 804, 637 N.W.2d 763, 00-3544.
806.06 AnnotationSub. (4) governs time limits when a judgment has been rendered. An order for consolidation is not a judgment and cannot trigger the time limits under sub. (4). Forman v. McPherson, 2004 WI App 145, 275 Wis. 2d 604, 685 N.W.2d 603, 03-2505.
806.06 AnnotationThe prevailing party’s claim for an award of attorney fees due under a contract does not affect the finality of a judgment or order that disposes of the entire matter in litigation as to one or more of the parties. There is no distinction between a claim for attorney fees based on a contract as opposed to one based on a statute. When the recovery of attorney fees is authorized by a statute or a contract, the attorney fees are litigation “disbursements and fees allowed by law” as set forth in s. 814.04 (2). McConley v. T.C. Visions, Inc., 2016 WI App 74, 371 Wis. 2d 658, 885 N.W.2d 816, 16-0671.
806.06 AnnotationWhen a party timely files its proposed bill of costs within the 30-day time limit for perfection set forth under sub. (4), the party’s right to recover costs is not forfeited simply because the costs are objected to and the circuit court does not resolve that objection within 30 days. Instead, a circuit court clerk may exercise the adjournment powers granted by s. 814.10 (3) to effectively toll the 30-day time limit for a reasonable time, until the circuit court can conduct a hearing to resolve the dispute. Soletski v. Krueger International, Inc., 2019 WI App 7, 385 Wis. 2d 787, 924 N.W.2d 207, 17-2063.
806.06 AnnotationHow to Collect on a Judgment After the Demise of the Creditor’s Lien. Stelljes. Wis. Law. July/Aug. 2016.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 574 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. 1998).
Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 574 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. 1998). “We conclude that Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) 3 sets forth the appropriate time limitation for an attorneys' fees award pursuant to 42 U.”
Purdy v. Cap Gemini Am., Inc., 2001 WI App 270 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “Purdy contends the circuit court erred in dismissing the action because the fees are based on a contract and are thus not governed by Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) (1999-2000). 1 We disagree and affirm.”
Kenosha Prof'l Firefighters, Local 414 v. City of Kenosha, 2009 WI 52 (Wis. 2009). “[7] The City opposed the application, arguing among other things that the firefighters' application was untimely under Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4). [8] The City contended that Wis.”
Soletski v. Krueger Int'l, Inc., 924 N.W.2d 207 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “BACKGROUND ¶3 Krueger owns and operates a furniture production facility in Green Bay that was built in 1972.”
Associated Bank N.A. v. Jack W. Collier, 2014 WI 62 (Wis. 2014). “" With regard to execution, Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) provides that "[n]o execution shall issue until the judgment is perfected or until the expiration of the time for perfection.”
State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123 (Wis. 2000). “In particular, Wis. Stat. §§ 806.06 , 972.13(4), and 971.”
In Re Marriage of Soquet v. Soquet, 345 N.W.2d 401 (Wis. 1984). “Clarification of what the term "given" means can be found in section 806.06, Stats., and the comments of the Judicial Council following.”
Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 2013 WI App 32 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). “Credit Acceptance first argues that Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) dictated that Kirk file his motion for attorney's fees and costs by August 23, 2010, that is, thirty days after the court entered its July 23, 2010 summary judgment order.”
McConley v. T. C. Visions, Inc., 2016 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). “The parties agree that the contractual entitlement to attorney fees is simply a taxation of costs under Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (l)(c) and (4), and that the pending claim for attorney fees does not preclude the dismissal order from being a final order appealable as of right.”
Forman v. McPherson, 2004 WI App 145 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “McPherson's and *608 Lakeland's motions for fees and costs were untimely under Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (2001-02). 1 ¶ 2. We reject Forman's claim that the defendants' motions were untimely.”
State v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50 (Wis. 2003). “*476 Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (1) (emphasis added).”
Werner v. Hendree, 2011 WI 10 (Wis. 2011). “See Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (2). ¶ 4. In fact, it was on June 24, 2008, that the circuit court held a bench trial and determined Hendree's liability and Werner's damages.”
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(1) — 6 cases
State v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50 (Wis. 2003). “*476 Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (1) (emphasis added).”
Harder v. Pfitzinger, 2004 WI 102 (Wis. 2004).
State v. Cegielski, 368 N.W.2d 628 (Wis. 1985).
Dane Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Dyanne M., 2007 WI App 129 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007).
Amanda Fisher v. M. F. (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(1)(a) — 3 cases
Associated Bank N.A. v. Jack W. Collier, 2014 WI 62 (Wis. 2014). “" With regard to execution, Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) provides that "[n]o execution shall issue until the judgment is perfected or until the expiration of the time for perfection.”
State Ex Rel. Bergmann v. Faust, 595 N.W.2d 75 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
Amanda Fisher v. M. F. (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(1)(b) — 6 cases
Marriage of Steinbach v. Gustafson, 502 N.W.2d 156 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50 (Wis. 2003). “*476 Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (1) (emphasis added).”
Weina Ex Rel. Peyton v. Atl. Mut. Ins., 501 N.W.2d 465 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
Dodge v. Carauna, 377 N.W.2d 208 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985).
Harry B. Mains v. Russ Darrow Grp., Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(1)(c) — 2 cases
DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd. P'ship, 2003 WI App 190 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).
Am. Oversight v. Robin Vos (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(2) — 1 case
State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123 (Wis. 2000). “In particular, Wis. Stat. §§ 806.06 , 972.13(4), and 971.”
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(3) — 5 cases
In Re Marriage of Soquet v. Soquet, 345 N.W.2d 401 (Wis. 1984). “Clarification of what the term "given" means can be found in section 806.06, Stats., and the comments of the Judicial Council following.”
Mohr v. City of Milwaukee, 315 N.W.2d 504 (Wis. 1982).
Mock v. Czemierys, 336 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983).
Michael L. Moss v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Michele M. Ford (Wis. Ct. App. 2023).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(4) — 13 cases
Soletski v. Krueger Int'l, Inc., 924 N.W.2d 207 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “BACKGROUND ¶3 Krueger owns and operates a furniture production facility in Green Bay that was built in 1972.”
Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 2013 WI App 32 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). “Credit Acceptance first argues that Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) dictated that Kirk file his motion for attorney's fees and costs by August 23, 2010, that is, thirty days after the court entered its July 23, 2010 summary judgment order.”
Kenosha Prof'l Firefighters, Local 414 v. City of Kenosha, 2009 WI 52 (Wis. 2009). “[7] The City opposed the application, arguing among other things that the firefighters' application was untimely under Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4). [8] The City contended that Wis.”
Purdy v. Cap Gemini Am., Inc., 2001 WI App 270 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “Purdy contends the circuit court erred in dismissing the action because the fees are based on a contract and are thus not governed by Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) (1999-2000). 1 We disagree and affirm.”
Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 574 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. 1998). “We conclude that Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) 3 sets forth the appropriate time limitation for an attorneys' fees award pursuant to 42 U.”
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(5) — 7 cases
In Re Marriage of Soquet v. Soquet, 345 N.W.2d 401 (Wis. 1984). “Clarification of what the term "given" means can be found in section 806.06, Stats., and the comments of the Judicial Council following.”
Bruns v. Muniz, 295 N.W.2d 11 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980).
Wisconsin State Employees Union v. Henderson, 317 N.W.2d 170 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982).
Dobberfuhl v. Madison White Trucks, Inc., 347 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984).
Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. Manhattan Life Ins., 279 N.W.2d 492 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(l)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123 (Wis. 2000). “In particular, Wis. Stat. §§ 806.06 , 972.13(4), and 971.”
Mikrut v. State, 569 N.W.2d 765 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(l)(b) — 3 cases
Harder v. Pfitzinger, 2004 WI 102 (Wis. 2004).
Hottenroth v. Hetsko, 2006 WI App 249 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006).
Booth v. Am. States Ins., 544 N.W.2d 921 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
— Wis. Stat. § 806.06(l)(c) — 5 cases
DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd. P'ship, 2003 WI App 190 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).
Booth v. Am. States Ins., 544 N.W.2d 921 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
Purdy v. Cap Gemini Am., Inc., 2001 WI App 270 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “Purdy contends the circuit court erred in dismissing the action because the fees are based on a contract and are thus not governed by Wis. Stat. § 806.06 (4) (1999-2000). 1 We disagree and affirm.”
Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 2015 WI App 14 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015).
Guziak v. Guziak, 609 F. Supp. 65 (W.D. Wis. 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.