Wis. Stat. § 815.24

Indemnity may be required

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

815.24815.24 Indemnity may be required. If there is any reasonable doubt as to the ownership of the property or as to its liability to be taken on the execution the officer may require sufficient security to indemnify the officer for levying upon such property.

815.24 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 761 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 815.24; 1993 a. 486.

815.24 AnnotationThe term “reasonable” requires that the officer provide a reason for requiring security. Ter Maat v. Barnett, 156 Wis. 2d 737, 457 N.W.2d 551 (Ct. App. 1990).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1990–2014 · leading case: Ter Maat v. Barnett

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ter Maat v. Barnett (1990) wisctapp · cites it 7× “This appeal involves the application of sec. 815.24, Stats., governing the right of an officer to require security for the execution of a judgment.”

In re Ingram (2014) wieb · cites it 2× “If the Sheriff required Wilson to post a bond under Wis. Stat. § 815.24 , the Bank may have some recourse against the bonding company.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.