Wis. Stat. § 906.04

Interpreters

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

906.04906.04 Interpreters. An interpreter is subject to the provisions of chs. 901 to 911 relating to qualification as an expert and the administration of an oath or affirmation that the interpreter will make a true translation.

906.04 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 59 Wis. 2d R1, R162 (1973); 1981 c. 390; 1991 a. 32.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2001 · leading case: State v. Santiago

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Santiago (1996) wis · cites it 2× “18 Wis. Stat. § 906.04 provides: "An interpreter is subject to the provisions of chs.”

Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee (2001) wisctapp · cites it 2× “3 In a related argument, Lake Bluff suggests that an abatement order cannot be issued without joining the tenants and mortgagee as necessary parties under Wis. Stat. § 906.04 (11). Lake Bluffs suggestion, however, is untimely.”

Hagenkord v. State (1981) wis “See sec. 906.04, Stats. The purpose of Boyd’s testimony, that of an expert translator of medical terms into layman’s English, was not challenged by the defense.”

Crawford v. Care Concepts, Inc. (2001) wis · cites it 2× “5 Care Concepts focuses upon the portion of Wis. Stat. § 906.04 (2) which provides that "information" that is "obtained.”

Sybron Transition Corp. v. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford (2000) wied · cites it 2× “It is true that Sybron brought this declaratory judgment action to finally determine coverage due to Security’s reservation of rights in the nonwaiver agreement, and that rather than conceding that its policies were triggered at all Security counterclaimed, denying any liability…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.