Wyo. Stat. § 31-5-229
Reckless driving.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who drives any vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1979–2016 · leading case: Danculovich v. Brown
Danculovich v. Brown (1979)
“6); and § 31-5-229, W.S. 1977, defining the crime of reckless driving to be driving a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.”
Keser v. State (1987)
“After a jury trial in county court, appellant Randy Keser was convicted of reckless driving, § 31-5-229, W.S. 1977, reckless endangering, § 6-2-504, W.”
Andrew Mascarenas v. The State of Wyoming (2013)
“]" Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 31-5-229 (LexisNexis 2018) We have long recognized that "willful misconduct implies at least the intentional doing of something either with a knowledge that serious injury is a probable (as distinguished from a possible) result, or the intentional doing of…”
Wood v. City of Casper (1984)
“This is an appeal from an affirmance by the district court of a judgment of the municipal court of the City of Casper finding appellant guilty after a trial to the court of reckless driving in violation of § 31-5-229, W.S.1977, and of leaving the scene of an accident in…”
Ryan Russell Webster v. State (2016)
“§ 31-5-229 (LexisNexis 2015). Neither of these charges is relevant to the issues presented in this appeal.”
Wood v. City of Casper (1983)
“These offenses were charged as having occurred on October 22, 1980, and specifically were for reckless driving in violation of § 31-5-229, W.S.1977, and leaving the scene of an accident in • violation of § 31-5-1102, W.”
Rhoades v. State (1991)
“The offense for which the reckless driving conviction was entered is found in W.S. 31-5-229: *235 Any person who drives any vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.