Wyo. Stat. § 35-7-1001
Short title.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Wyoming Controlled Substances Act of 1971".
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: White v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.
White v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (1982)
“1977: "(a) Except as authorized by this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to XX-X-XXXX], it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance.”
Hennigan v. State (1987)
“other provision for immunity or requirement is provided that testimony can be elicited involuntarily when the right is invoked, except in separate statutory provision relating to controlled substance: "All duly authorized peace officers including any special agents or other…”
Wright v. State (1983)
“This statute provides in relevant part: "(a) Except as authorized by this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to XX-X-XXXX], it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance.”
Gist v. State (1987)
“1977, provides: "(a) Except as authorized by this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to XX-X-XXXX], it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance.”
In the Matter of U.S. Currency Totaling $470,040.00: Robert Miller v. The State of Wyoming (2020)
“Readers are requested to notify the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Building, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, of any typographical or other formal errors so that correction may be made before final publication in the permanent volume. BOOMGAARDEN, Justice. [¶1] The State of…”
Dawkins v. State (1988)
“Code Ann. §§ 4476-15 (Vernon 1976); Utah Code Ann.”
Ostrowski v. State (1983)
“Section 35-7-1031(a), supra, provides in pertinent part: “(a) Except as authorized by this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to 35-7-1055], it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance.”
Apodaca v. State (1981)
“1977: “(a) Except as authorized by this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to 35-7-1055], it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance.”
Palato v. State (1999)
“However, the adoption of the Wyoming Controlled Substances Act, §§ 35-7-1001 et seq., suggests the legislature intended to treat drug crimes differently.”
Dover v. State (1983)
“— Persons registered by the board under this act [§§ 35-7-1001 to 35-7-1055] to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or conduct research with controlled substances may possess, manufacture, distribute, dispense, or conduct research with those substances to the extent authorized by…”
State v. Eleven Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Six Dollars & No Cents in United States Currency (1989)
“The district court determined that the State had not established probable cause to believe that the money was used or intended to be used in violation of the Wyoming Controlled Substance Act of 1971, W.S. 35-7-1001 through 35-7-1057, and, therefore, granted Jaeger’s motion for…”
Baker v. State (2010)
“However, the adoption of the Wyoming Controlled Substances Act, §§ 35-7-1001 et seq., suggests the legislature intended to treat drug crimes differently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.