Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201 (2026)
"Habitual criminal" defined; penalties.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) A person is an habitual criminal if:
(i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and
(ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or
more previous charges separately brought and tried which arose
out of separate occurrences in this state or elsewhere.
(b) An habitual criminal shall be punished by imprisonment
for:
(i) Not less than ten (10) years nor more than fifty
(50) years, if he has two (2) previous convictions;
(ii) Life, if he has three (3) or more previous
convictions for offenses committed after the person reached the
age of eighteen (18) years of age.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 76
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Small v. State, 689 P.2d 420 (Wyo. 1984).
Small v. State, 689 P.2d 420 (Wyo. 1984). “Wyoming Statute § 6-10-201 (1983 Cum.Supp.) et seq. violates procedural due process at sentencing.”
Black v. State, 405 P.3d 1045 (Wyo. 2017). “a “Notice of Enhanced Penalties” and alleged that Appellant was a habitual criminal under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (a)(ii) with three prior felony convictions.”
Smith v. State, 2009 WY 2 (Wyo. 2009). “§ 6-10-201 (Lexis-Nexis 2007) requires enhancement of a sentence if the defendant is a habitual criminal: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: G) He is convicted of a violent felony; and (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous charges separately…”
Daniel v. State, 2003 WY 132 (Wyo. 2003). “The State also sought habitual criminal status under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 based upon Daniel's prior felony convictions.”
Bloomer v. State, 2010 WY 88 (Wyo. 2010). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2009) requires enhancement of a sentence if the defendant is a habitual criminal: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous…”
Brown v. State, 2004 WY 119 (Wyo. 2004). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2001).”
Christopher Ray Counts, 2014 WY 151 (Wyo. 2014). “The jury also found him to be a habitual criminal pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2009) based upon evidence that he had three prior felony convictions.”
Thomas v. State, 2006 WY 34 (Wyo. 2006). “§ 6 — 2—502(a)(i) (LexisNexis 2005) and found him to be an habitual criminal under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (a)(i) and (ii) (LexisNexis 2005).”
Thompson v. State, 408 P.3d 756 (Wyo. 2018). “§ 6-10-201 (Lexis-Nexis 2017) provides enhanced penalties for habitual criminals: Section 6-10-201(a) states: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and ’ ■ (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous charges…”
Urbigkit v. State, 2003 WY 57 (Wyo. 2003). “Urbigkit claims the habitual criminal statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2001), provides for punishment by imprisonment for "life," not life for each conviction.”
Oakley v. State, 715 P.2d 1374 (Wyo. 1986). “John Oakley, now convicted of his third felony (the last being aggravated robbery), was sentenced pursuant to Wyoming’s habitual-criminal statute, § 6-10-201, W.S. 1977 (1983 Replacement), to a confinement of ten to 20 years.”
Keene v. State, 812 P.2d 147 (Wyo. 1991). “William Dean Keene appeals from his conviction on two counts of kidnapping and one count of aggravated robbery, and the enhancement of his sentence on the finding that he is a habitual criminal under W.S. 6-10-201 (June 1988 Repl.). We affirm the aggravated robbery conviction…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(a) — 11 cases
Thompson v. State, 408 P.3d 756 (Wyo. 2018). “§ 6-10-201 (Lexis-Nexis 2017) provides enhanced penalties for habitual criminals: Section 6-10-201(a) states: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and ’ ■ (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous charges…”
Bloomer v. State, 2010 WY 88 (Wyo. 2010). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2009) requires enhancement of a sentence if the defendant is a habitual criminal: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous…”
Gunderson v. State, 925 P.2d 1300 (Wyo. 1996).
Simonds v. State, 762 P.2d 1189 (Wyo. 1988).
Marquess v. State, 2011 WY 95 (Wyo. 2011).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(a)(i) — 3 cases
Small v. State, 689 P.2d 420 (Wyo. 1984). “Wyoming Statute § 6-10-201 (1983 Cum.Supp.) et seq. violates procedural due process at sentencing.”
Tuggle v. State, 733 P.2d 610 (Wyo. 1987).
Rich v. State, 899 P.2d 1345 (Wyo. 1995).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(a)(ii) — 2 cases
Green v. State, 784 P.2d 1360 (Wyo. 1989).
State v. Williams, 663 A.2d 1378 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(b) — 1 case
James Edward Rogers, 2015 WY 48 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(b)(i) — 7 cases
Bloomer v. State, 2010 WY 88 (Wyo. 2010). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2009) requires enhancement of a sentence if the defendant is a habitual criminal: (a) A person is an habitual criminal if: (i) He is convicted of a violent felony; and (ii) He has been convicted of a felony on two (2) or more previous…”
Jones v. State, 771 P.2d 368 (Wyo. 1989).
Daniel v. State, 2003 WY 132 (Wyo. 2003). “The State also sought habitual criminal status under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 based upon Daniel's prior felony convictions.”
Christopher Ray Counts, 2014 WY 151 (Wyo. 2014). “The jury also found him to be a habitual criminal pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-201 (LexisNexis 2009) based upon evidence that he had three prior felony convictions.”
Zebadiah William Harris, 2015 WY 50 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-10-201(b)(ii) — 5 cases
Amin v. State, 811 P.2d 255 (Wyo. 1991).
Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123 (Wyo. 1995).
Rands v. State, 818 P.2d 44 (Wyo. 1991).
Rich v. State, 899 P.2d 1345 (Wyo. 1995).
Jerald Thomas Fallon v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 110 (Wyo. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.