Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-1102

Authority to establish programs; rulemaking

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

authority.

     (a) The department is authorized to adopt reasonable rules
and regulations to establish an intensive supervision program
for probationers and parolees.

     (b) An intensive supervision program established under
this article may require:

          (i) Electronic monitoring, regimented daily schedules
or itineraries, house arrest, telephone contact, drug testing,
curfew checks or other supervision methods which facilitate
contact with supervisory personnel;

          (ii) Community service work, family, educational or
vocational counseling, cognitive-behavioral programming to
address criminal thinking, treatment for substance abuse, mental
health treatment and monitoring of restitution orders and fines
previously imposed on the participant. For purposes of this
paragraph, cognitive-behavioral programming means as defined in
W.S. 7-13-1801(c)(i); and

          (iii)   Imposition of supervision fees to be paid by
participants.

     (c) Subject to legislative appropriation, the department
may, by negotiation without competitive bid or by competitive
bidding, contract with any governmental or nongovernmental
entity to provide services required to carry out the provisions
of this article.

     (d) The department shall have general supervisory
authority over all probationers and parolees participating in a
program under this article.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: State v. Grady

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Grady (2019) nc · cites it 2× “48 (West 2019); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-1102 (b)(i) (2017).”

Duke v. State (2009) wyo “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the absence of the commission of these acts, those programs and sanctions set forth in W.S. 7-13-1102 and 7-13-1107(b) may be used at the discretion of the probation officer or court to address other violations of the sentencing or…”

Bailey v. State (1999) md “); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-1102 (1995 & 1996 Supp.”

Umbach v. State (2002) wyo “§ 7-13-1102. As a condition of his ISP, Umbach agreed that he would remain drug and alcohol free.”

Moehr v. State (2000) wyo · cites it 2× “Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 7-13-1102 (LEXIS 1999) The statute makes plain that participation in the program is a matter of grace and not of right.”

William R. Durkin, Iii v. The State of Wyoming (2024) wyo · cites it 2× “On the other hand, a probation agent in Wyoming could have sanctioned him for violating probation by requiring him to participate in intensive supervised probation, house arrest, electronic monitoring, or treatment for substance abuse.”

Cooper v. State (2018) wyo “The discretion provided to sentencing courts in subsections (a) and (c), extends to a situation where a qualified offender's probation is revoked, and the offender is subject to a period of imprisonment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.