Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 09 - Administration of the Government / Chapter 1 - STATE OFFICERS / Article 6 - ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 9-1-612 (2026)

Duties of director; deputy directors;

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
appointment; duties; capitol security; security personnel
requirements and powers.

     (a) The director shall supervise and direct all activities
of the division. Subject to the written approval of the attorney
general, the director shall prescribe rules and regulations not
inconsistent with law to implement this act. The director is
responsible to the attorney general for the operation of the
division.

     (b) With the approval of the attorney general the director
may appoint one (1) or more deputy directors who shall perform
duties as assigned by the director.

     (c)   Repealed By Laws 2001, Ch. 45, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–1999 · leading case: Peterson v. Wyoming Game & Fish Comm'n, 989 P.2d 113 (Wyo. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peterson v. Wyoming Game & Fish Comm'n, 989 P.2d 113 (Wyo. 1999). “9-1-613 and capítol police designated and appointed under W.S. 9-1-612 who have qualified pursuant to W.”
Marshall v. State, Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp., 941 P.2d 42 (Wyo. 1997). “The hearing examiner reasoned that campus police officers derive their authority from the legislature and, had the legislature intended to limit their jurisdiction, it would have done so expressly, as it did with state park officials in W.”
Marshall v. State ex rel. Dep't of Transp., 941 P.2d 42 (Wyo. 1997). “The hearing examiner reasoned that campus police officers derive their authority from the legislature and, had the legislature intended to limit their jurisdiction, it would have done so expressly, as it did with state park officials in W.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 9-1-612(c) — 2 cases
Marshall v. State, Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp., 941 P.2d 42 (Wyo. 1997). “The hearing examiner reasoned that campus police officers derive their authority from the legislature and, had the legislature intended to limit their jurisdiction, it would have done so expressly, as it did with state park officials in W.”
Marshall v. State ex rel. Dep't of Transp., 941 P.2d 42 (Wyo. 1997). “The hearing examiner reasoned that campus police officers derive their authority from the legislature and, had the legislature intended to limit their jurisdiction, it would have done so expressly, as it did with state park officials in W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.