Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 13A-3-28 (2026)
Use of Force in Resisting Arrest Prohibited.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
A person may not use physical force to resist a lawful arrest by a law enforcement officer who is known or reasonably appears to be a law enforcement officer.
(Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, §635; Act 2025-423, §3.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1983–2013 · leading case: Spencer v. State, 58 So. 3d 215 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009).
Spencer v. State, 58 So. 3d 215 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009). “This comes out of the Code of Alabama 1975, § 13A-3-28. A person may not use physical force to resist a lawful arrest by a peace officer who is known or reasonably appears to be a police officer.”
State v. Wiegmann, 714 A.2d 841 (Md. 1998). “051 (West 1992 & 1998 Supp.); Haw.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
Ex Parte Wilhite, 485 So. 2d 787 (Ala. 1986). “III-D-14 (1980); Alabama Code (1975), § 13A-3-28. We have reviewed the record and find no error substantially prejudicial to Wilhite.”
State v. Hobson, 577 N.W.2d 825 (Wis. 1998). “See Ala. Code § 13A-3-28 (1994); Ark. Code Ann.”
State v. Valentine, 935 P.2d 1294 (Wash. 1997). “Ala. Code § 13A-3-28 (1994); Ark. Code Ann.”
Shinault v. City of Huntsville, 579 So. 2d 696 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991). “" Commentary to Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-3-28 at 71; Commentary to § 13A-10-41 at 380.”
Commonwealth v. Moreira, 447 N.E.2d 1224 (Mass. 1983). “See Ala. Code § 13A-3-28 (1982); Ark. Stat. Ann.”
Brown v. City of Oklahoma City, 721 P.2d 1346 (Okla. Civ. App. 1986). “38, § 7-7 (Smith-Hurd 1972); Iowa Code § 804.12 (1980); Mont.”
Glover v. State, 594 A.2d 1224 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1991). “38, § 7-7 (Smith-Hurd 1972); Iowa Code § 804.12 (1980) (common law holding codified); Mont.”
Morris v. Town of Lexington, 915 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (N.D. Ala. 2013). “Likewise, the commentary to Alabama Code § 13A-3-28 “allows a person to use reasonable force to resist an unlawful arrest.”
State v. Valentine, 935 P.2d 1294 (Wash. 1997). “[11] Ala.Code § 13A-3-28 (1994); Ark.Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.