Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 6-9-192 (2026)
Revival of Judgment of District or Circuit Court When Execution Did Not Issue.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
No execution shall issue on a judgment of the district or circuit court on which an execution has not been sued out within 10 years of its entry until the same has been revived by appropriate motion or action under the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.
(Code 1852, §2419; Code 1867, §2830; Code 1876, §3174; Code 1886, §2923; Code 1896, §1925; Code 1907, §4148; Code 1923, §7863; Code 1940, T. 7, §574.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2021 · leading case: Willey v. Willey, 203 So. 3d 875 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016).
Willey v. Willey, 203 So. 3d 875 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). “” ■ She also cited Ala.Code 1975, § 6-9-192, which provides that a judgment on which an execution has not been made within 10 years of its entry may be revived by appropriate motion or action.”
McCrory & Williams, Inc. v. Allen, 155 So. 3d 1018 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). “See Ala.Code 1975, § 6-9-192 (“No execution shall issue on a judgment of the district or circuit court on which an execution has not been sued out within 10 years of its entry until the same has been revived by appropriate motion or action under the Alabama Rules of Civil…”
Hooie v. Barksdale, 93 So. 3d 942 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012). “In November 2010, Barksdale filed a motion to revive the default judgment, pursuant to § 6-9-192, Ala.Code 1975, which provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o execution shall issue on a judgment .”
Allen v. First Alabama Bank (In re Sintz), 162 B.R. 572 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 1993). “The “date of such judgment” language, when viewed in pari materia with the relevant provisions in Title 6, Article 8, Code of Alabama 1975, is susceptible to only one interpretation: that “date of such judgment” means the date of entry.”
Davis Int'l, Inc. ex rel. Patel v. Berryman, 730 So. 2d 242 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999). “On January 22, 1996, just over 10 years from the entry of the judgment, Davis International filed its motion to revive the judgment, pursuant to § 6-9-192, Ala.Code 1975. That motion was filed within the time limits imposed by §§ 6-9-190 and 6-9-191, Ala.”
Johnson v. Emerson, 185 So. 3d 1120 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015). “The judgment was not paid, and on May 3,2007,' Redstone filed a motion in the trial court to revive the judgment pursuant to § 6-9-192, Ala.Code 1975,' which provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o execution shall issue on a judgment ,; on which an execution has not been sued…”
United States v. Fiorella, 869 F.2d 1425 (11th Cir. 1989). “The January 3, 1968, judgment had become dormant by operation of Ala.Code § 6-9-192 (1975) (no execution shall issue on a judgment on which an execution has not been sued out within 10 years of its entry until the same has been revived by appropriate motion or action).”
Hines v. Cunningham, 622 So. 2d 395 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). “” The mother cites § 6-9-192, which provides that a judgment may be revived by appropriate motion or action.”
Gloor v. BancorpSouth Bank, 216 So. 3d 444 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). “However, Gloor’s filing-fee argument completely misconstrues the nature of postjudgment revivor relief permissible pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 6-9-192, which in its 1975 recodification permitting revivor by “appropriate motion .”
Stubbs v. Parcel 1 (M.D. Ala. 2021). “”); Ala. Code § 6-9-192 (“No execution shall issue on a judgment of the district or circuit court on which an execution has not been sued out within 10 years of its entry until the same has been revived by appropriate motion or action under the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.”
AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Bischoff, 678 So. 2d 1102 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995). “” Section 6-9-192, Ala.Code 1975, provides: “No execution shall issue on a judgment .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.