Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 09.43.010 (2026)
Arbitration agreements valid; application of article
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 09.43.010. Arbitration agreements valid; application of article.
(a) A written agreement to submit an existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit to arbitration a subsequent controversy between the parties is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable, except upon grounds that exist at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract. However, AS 09.43.010 — 09.43.180 do not apply to a labor-management contract unless they are incorporated into the contract by reference or their application is provided for by statute.
(b) Notwithstanding (a) of this section, AS 09.43.010 — 09.43.180 do not apply to an agreement or a contract unless the agreement or contract is entered into before January 1, 2005, and is not otherwise subject to AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595. A person may not waive the effective date of this subsection, and a waiver of the effective date of this subsection is void.
(a) A written agreement to submit an existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit to arbitration a subsequent controversy between the parties is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable, except upon grounds that exist at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract. However, AS 09.43.010 — 09.43.180 do not apply to a labor-management contract unless they are incorporated into the contract by reference or their application is provided for by statute.
(b) Notwithstanding (a) of this section, AS 09.43.010 — 09.43.180 do not apply to an agreement or a contract unless the agreement or contract is entered into before January 1, 2005, and is not otherwise subject to AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595. A person may not waive the effective date of this subsection, and a waiver of the effective date of this subsection is void.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1972–2014 · leading case: Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc., 433 So. 2d 1158 (Ala. 1983).
Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc., 433 So. 2d 1158 (Ala. 1983). “(1981); Fla.Stat. §§ 682.01, et seq. (1980); Ga.Code §§ 7-101, et seq.”
Maietta v. Greenfield, 297 A.2d 244 (Md. 1972). “Alaska Stat. § 09.43.010 et seq.; Ariz. Rev.”
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Union 2548 v. Victor Fluid Power Co., 369 N.W.2d 805 (Iowa 1985). “Alaska Stat. § 09.43.010 (1983); Ark. StatAnn.”
State v. Nakanelua, 323 P.3d 136 (Haw. App. 2014). “) (excluding "an arbitration between an employer and a duly elected representative of employees under a [CBA] or collectively negotiated agreement” from New Jersey’s version of the RUAA); Alaska Stat. Ann. § 09.43.010 (West, Westlaw through 2013 1st Reg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.