Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.20.280 (2026)
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 11.20.280 — 11.20.340. Embezzlement. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978. For theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received or held, see AS 11.46.210.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1965–1984 · leading case: Andrews v. State, 552 P.2d 150 (Alaska 1976).
Andrews v. State, 552 P.2d 150 (Alaska 1976). “51 from her employer between August 23, 1973, and October 31, *151 1973, in violation of AS 11.20.280. 1 Andrews was hereafter sentenced to serve a term of 10 years’ imprisonment with 5 years suspended.”
Huff v. State, 598 P.2d 928 (Alaska 1979). “The statutes under which Huff was charged, AS 11.20.280, AS 11.20.290 and AS 11.20.340 all require that the defendant convert money or property belonging to “another.”
Karr v. State, 686 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 1984). “An officer, agent, clerk, employee, or servant who embezzles or fraudulently converts to his own use, or takes or secretes with intent to embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use, money, property, or thing of another which may be the subject of larceny, and which has come…”
Milne v. State, 607 P.2d 360 (Alaska 1980). “020(2)), seven counts of embezzlement by an employee (AS 11.20.280) and one violation of the election campaign disclosure laws (AS 15.”
Stange v. State, 559 P.2d 650 (Alaska 1977). “Appellant Dennis Stange was indicted for the crime of embezzlement by an employee in violation of AS 11.20.280. 1 Subsequent to the return of the indictment Stange made several pre-trial motions to suppress on the grounds that the evidence in question was obtained by means of…”
Dickens v. State, 398 P.2d 1008 (Alaska 1965). “Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted on five counts of an indictment charging embezzlement by an agent in violation of AS 11.20.280. We gather from the record that the alleged agency status of the defendant consisted of his acting as a collector for others of accounts…”
Karr v. State, 660 P.2d 450 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “Former AS 11.20.280 reads: Embezzlement by employee or servant An officer, agent, clerk, employee, or servant who embezzles or fraudulently converts to his own use, or takes or secretes with intent to embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use, money, property, or thing of…”
Mullins v. State, 573 P.2d 860 (Alaska 1978). “00, in violation of AS 11.20.280. He pled nolo contendere to the indictment.”
Smith v. State, 651 P.2d 7 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “300, and with embezzlement by employee, former AS 11.20.280. Following a thirty-three day trial, a jury found Smith guilty of embezzle *8 ment of public money.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.