Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510 (2026)

Robbery in the second degree

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.41.510. Robbery in the second degree.
 (a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree if, in the course of taking or attempting to take property from the immediate presence and control of another, the person uses or threatens the immediate use of force upon any person with intent to
     (1) prevent or overcome resistance to the taking of the property or the retention of the property after taking; or

     (2) compel any person to deliver the property or engage in other conduct which might aid in the taking of the property.

 (b) Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: State v. Owens, 20 S.W.3d 634 (Tenn. 2000).
State v. Owens, 20 S.W.3d 634 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 3× “Code § 13A-8-43 (1994); Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510 (Michie 1998); Ariz.”
Newell v. State, 771 P.2d 873 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 6× “Newell pled no contest and was convicted of four counts of robbery in the second degree, AS 11.41.510(a)(1), a class B felony; AS 11.”
United States v. Pereira-Gomez, 903 F.3d 155 (2d Cir. 2018). “, Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510 (a) ("immediate presence and control of another"); Ariz.”
Hugo v. City of Fairbanks, 658 P.2d 155 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 5× “41.510 states in relevant part: Robbery in the Second Degree, (a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree if, in the course of taking or attempting to take property from the immediate presence and control of a person, he uses or threatens the immediate use of…”
Baker v. State, 905 P.2d 479 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “Baker was convicted of second-degree robbery, AS 11.41.510(a), following a jury trial in the Fairbanks superior court.”
Abdulbaqui v. State, 728 P.2d 1211 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “500(a) outlines the elements of first-degree robbery: A person commits the crime of robbery in the first degree if the person violates AS 11.41.510 and, in the course of violating that section or in immediate flight thereafter, that person or another participant (1) is armed…”
Cathey v. State, 60 P.3d 192 (Alaska Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “This count, tracking the language of AS 11.41.510(a), charged Cathey with using or threatening the immediate use of force to take, or attempt to take, property from the immediate presence and control of *198 another.”
Minano v. State, 690 P.2d 28 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “500; AS 11.41.510. In light of these differences in intent and in light of the fact that the taking in this case involved an automobile, it would in theory have been possible to convict of robbery *33 and acquit of theft.”
Ward v. State, 120 P.3d 204 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “In the commentary to AS 11.41.510, the legislature declared that the phrase "immediate presence and control" was intended to be "broad enough to cover takings directly from the person as well as takings which, though not from the person, pose identical dangers-i.”
State v. Richards, 720 P.2d 47 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “500 (robbery in the first degree) with AS 11.41.510 (robbery in the second degree).”
United States v. Garcia-Caraveo, 586 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir. 2009). “See Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510 ; Conn. Gen.Stat.”
State v. Moore, 649 S.E.2d 84 (S.C. Ct. App. 2007). “Code § 13A-8-43 (LexisNexis 2005); Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510 (2006); Ariz.Rev.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510(a) — 19 cases
Cathey v. State, 60 P.3d 192 (Alaska Ct. App. 2002). “This count, tracking the language of AS 11.41.510(a), charged Cathey with using or threatening the immediate use of force to take, or attempt to take, property from the immediate presence and control of *198 another.”
Baker v. State, 905 P.2d 479 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995). “Baker was convicted of second-degree robbery, AS 11.41.510(a), following a jury trial in the Fairbanks superior court.”
Lewandowski v. State, 18 P.3d 1220 (Alaska Ct. App. 2001).
Abdulbaqui v. State, 728 P.2d 1211 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). “500(a) outlines the elements of first-degree robbery: A person commits the crime of robbery in the first degree if the person violates AS 11.41.510 and, in the course of violating that section or in immediate flight thereafter, that person or another participant (1) is armed…”
Whitescarver v. State, 962 P.2d 192 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998).
— Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510(a)(1) — 14 cases
Newell v. State, 771 P.2d 873 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “Newell pled no contest and was convicted of four counts of robbery in the second degree, AS 11.41.510(a)(1), a class B felony; AS 11.”
Ward v. State, 120 P.3d 204 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005). “In the commentary to AS 11.41.510, the legislature declared that the phrase "immediate presence and control" was intended to be "broad enough to cover takings directly from the person as well as takings which, though not from the person, pose identical dangers-i.”
Terry Allen Turner v. State of Alaska, 552 P.3d 1077 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024).
Gibson v. State, 346 P.3d 977 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015).
Marker v. State, 692 P.2d 977 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984).
— Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510(a)(l) — 1 case
Paige v. State, 115 P.3d 1244 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005).
— Alaska Stat. § 11.41.510(b) — 7 cases
Newell v. State, 771 P.2d 873 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “Newell pled no contest and was convicted of four counts of robbery in the second degree, AS 11.41.510(a)(1), a class B felony; AS 11.”
Snelling v. State, 123 P.3d 1096 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005).
Baker v. State, 905 P.2d 479 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995). “Baker was convicted of second-degree robbery, AS 11.41.510(a), following a jury trial in the Fairbanks superior court.”
Williams v. State, 759 P.2d 575 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988).
Andrew v. State, 835 P.2d 1251 (Alaska Ct. App. 1992).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.