Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.46.285 (2026)

Fraudulent use of an access device or identification document

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.285. Fraudulent use of an access device or identification document.
 (a) A person commits the crime of fraudulent use of an access device or identification document if, with intent to defraud, the person uses an access device or identification document to obtain property or services with knowledge that
     (1) the access device or identification document is stolen or forged;

     (2) the access device or identification document is expired or has been revoked or cancelled; or

     (3) for any other reason, that person's use of the access device or identification document is unauthorized by either the issuer or the person to whom the access device or identification document is issued.

 (b) Fraudulent use of an access device or identification document is
     (1) a class B felony if the value of the property or services obtained is $25,000 or more;

     (2) a class C felony if the value of the property or services obtained is $75 or more but less than $25,000;

     (3) a class A misdemeanor if the value of the property or services obtained is less than $75.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Wells v. State, 687 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984).
Wells v. State, 687 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “AS 11.46.285. In 1979 Wells had been convicted of burglary in Oregon.”
Kankanton v. State, 342 P.3d 840 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “20, 2000) (explaining that theft of an "access device" was intended to encompass theft of a debit card or other credit device).”
Phillips v. State, 211 P.3d 1148 (Alaska Ct. App. 2009). “Counts 2, 13, and 16 were charged under AS 11.46.130(a)(1). Counts 6 and 9 were charged under AS 11.”
State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The superior court’s ruling concerning the meaning of “credit card” in AS 11.”
Clayton Andrew Charlie v. State of Alaska, 563 P.3d 76 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024). “740(a)(1), AS 11.46.285(b)(3), and AS 28.35.400, respectively.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.285(a) — 1 case
State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). “The superior court’s ruling concerning the meaning of “credit card” in AS 11.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.285(a)(1) — 1 case
Phillips v. State, 211 P.3d 1148 (Alaska Ct. App. 2009). “Counts 2, 13, and 16 were charged under AS 11.46.130(a)(1). Counts 6 and 9 were charged under AS 11.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.285(b)(1) — 1 case
Kankanton v. State, 342 P.3d 840 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “20, 2000) (explaining that theft of an "access device" was intended to encompass theft of a debit card or other credit device).”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.285(b)(3) — 1 case
Clayton Andrew Charlie v. State of Alaska, 563 P.3d 76 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024). “740(a)(1), AS 11.46.285(b)(3), and AS 28.35.400, respectively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.