Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.46.660 (2026)
Commercial bribe receiving
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.660. Commercial bribe receiving.
(a) A person commits the crime of commercial bribe receiving if the person solicits, accepts, or agrees to accept a benefit with intent to violate a duty to which that person is subject as
(1) an agent or employee of another;
(2) a trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary;
(3) a lawyer, physician, accountant, appraiser, or other professional adviser;
(4) an officer, director, partner, manager, or other participant in the direction of the affairs of an organization; or
(5) an arbitrator or other purportedly disinterested adjudicator or referee.
(b) Commercial bribe receiving is a class C felony.
(a) A person commits the crime of commercial bribe receiving if the person solicits, accepts, or agrees to accept a benefit with intent to violate a duty to which that person is subject as
(1) an agent or employee of another;
(2) a trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary;
(3) a lawyer, physician, accountant, appraiser, or other professional adviser;
(4) an officer, director, partner, manager, or other participant in the direction of the affairs of an organization; or
(5) an arbitrator or other purportedly disinterested adjudicator or referee.
(b) Commercial bribe receiving is a class C felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1992–2004 · leading case: United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of Am. v. Carl W. Mathisen, 974 F.2d 1502 (9th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of Am. v. Carl W. Mathisen, 974 F.2d 1502 (9th Cir. 1992). “It described numerous acts of racketeering, including offering items of value to Mayor Brower with the intent to influence his exercise of official discretion, as well as receiving money and property with the intent to violate their own fiduciary duties to the Borough, in…”
United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of Am. v. Carl W. Mathisen, 960 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1992). “It described numerous acts of racketeering, including offering items of value to Mayor Brower with the intent to influence his exercise of official discretion, as well as receiving money and property with the intent to violate their own fiduciary duties to the Borough, in…”
In Re the Extradition of Chan Seong-I, 346 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (D.N.M. 2004). “Code 1975 § 13A-11-121 (misdemeanor); Alaska Stat. § 11.46.660 (felony); Ariz.Rev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.