Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140 (2026)

Cruelty to animals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.61.140. Cruelty to animals.
 (a) A person commits cruelty to animals if the person
     (1) knowingly inflicts severe or prolonged physical pain or suffering on an animal;

     (2) has a legal duty to care for the animal and, with criminal negligence, fails to care for an animal and, as a result, causes the death of the animal or causes severe physical pain or prolonged suffering to the animal;

     (3) kills or injures an animal by the use of a decompression chamber;

     (4) intentionally kills or injures a pet or livestock by the use of poison;

     (5) knowingly kills or injures an animal, other than as provided in (1) or (3) of this subsection, with the intent to intimidate, threaten, or terrorize another person;

     (6) knowingly
          (A) engages in sexual conduct with an animal; or

          (B) under circumstances not proscribed under AS 11.41.455,
                (i) photographs or films, for purposes of sexual gratification, a person engaged in sexual conduct with an animal; or

                (ii) causes, induces, aids, or encourages another person to engage in sexual conduct with an animal; or

     (7) intentionally permits sexual conduct with an animal to be conducted on any premises under the person's control.

 (b) Each animal that is subject to cruelty to animals under (a) of this section shall constitute a separate offense.

 (c) It is a defense to a prosecution under this section that the conduct of the defendant
     (1) was part of scientific research governed by accepted standards;

     (2) constituted the humane destruction of an animal;

     (3) conformed to accepted veterinary or animal husbandry practices;

     (4) was necessarily incidental to lawful fishing, hunting or trapping activities;

     (5) conformed to professionally accepted training and discipline standards.

 (d) In (a)(2) of this section, failure to provide the minimum standards of care for an animal under AS 03.55.100 is prima facie evidence of failure to care for an animal.

 (e) This section does not apply to generally accepted dog mushing or pulling contests or practices or rodeos or stock contests.

 (f) In this section, “sexual conduct” means any
     (1) touching or fondling by a person, either directly or through clothing, of the genitals or anus of an animal or any transfer or transmission of semen by the person on any part of the animal for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal of the person;

     (2) contact, however slight, between the mouth, genitals, or anus of a person and the sex organ or anus of an animal, or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of the body of the person into the sex organ or anus of an animal, or any intrusion of the genitals or anus of the person into the mouth of the animal for the purpose of sexual gratification of the person.

 (g) Except as provided in (h) of this section, cruelty to animals under (a)(2), (5), (6), or (7) of this section is a class A misdemeanor. The court may also
     (1) require forfeiture of any animal affected to the state or to a custodian that supplies shelter, care, or medical treatment for the animal;

     (2) require the defendant to reimburse the state or a custodian for all reasonable costs incurred in providing necessary shelter, care, veterinary attention, or medical treatment for any animal affected;

     (3) prohibit or limit the defendant's ownership, possession, or custody of animals for up to 10 years.

 (h) Cruelty to animals under (a)(1), (3), or (4) of this section is a class C felony. Cruelty to animals is also a class C felony if the person is convicted under (a)(2), (5), (6), or (7) of this section and the person has been previously convicted on one or more separate occasions within 10 years of the date of the present offense of a crime under this section, AS 11.61.145(a)(1) or (2), or a law or ordinance of another jurisdiction having elements similar to those offenses. For a conviction under this subsection, the court may also
     (1) require forfeiture of any animal affected to the state or to a custodian that supplies shelter, care, or medical treatment for the animal;

     (2) require the defendant to reimburse the state or a custodian for all reasonable costs incurred in providing necessary shelter, care, veterinary attention, or medical treatment for any animal affected;

     (3) prohibit or limit the defendant's ownership, possession, or custody of animals for up to 10 years.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2023 · leading case: Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015).
Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “AS 11.61.140(2)(2). Sickel now appeals her conviction.”
& 14CA1436. People v. Harris, 2016 COA 159 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). “7 *372 ¶ 52 As states move away from property-law-based principles, many animal’ cruelty statutes now explicitly define the unit of prosecution as each animal victim, See Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140 (b) (20Í6) (“Each animal that is subject to cruelty to.”
United States v. Stevens, 533 F.3d 218 (3rd Cir. 2008). “The following state animal protection statutes are currently in place: Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140 (2004); Ala.Code § 13A-11-14 (1977); Ariz Rev.”
Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm'n, 779 P.2d 1199 (Alaska 1989). “130; cruelty to animals, AS 11.61.140; and prostitution, AS 11.66.”
People v. Allen, 657 P.2d 447 (Colo. 1983). “Code § 13A-11-14 (1977); Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140 (1962); Ariz.Rev.”
Mitchell v. Heinrichs, 27 P.3d 309 (Alaska 2001). “See also AS 11.61.140 (limiting cruelty to animals misdemeanor to infliction of severe pain or prolonged suffering, failure to care for animals, or killing by use of decompression chamber).”
Kinnish v. State, 777 P.2d 1179 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “Kinnish was also charged with cruelty to animals, AS 11.61.140(a)(1), for shooting at ducks in the pond, but the state dismissed this charge.”
Unknown, 559 U.S. 460. · cites it 2× “Alaska Alaska Stat. §11.61.140 (c)(4) (2008) (“It is a defense to a prosecution under this section that the conduct of the defendant .”
State of Washington v. Thelma Winger (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140 (g)(3), (h)(3). • In Oregon, for various animal cruelty offenses, judges are required to impose a 5-year or 15-year prohibition of ownership of animals in the same genus as the abused animal.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140(2)(2) — 1 case
Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “AS 11.61.140(2)(2). Sickel now appeals her conviction.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140(a) — 1 case
Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “AS 11.61.140(2)(2). Sickel now appeals her conviction.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140(a)(1) — 1 case
Kinnish v. State, 777 P.2d 1179 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “Kinnish was also charged with cruelty to animals, AS 11.61.140(a)(1), for shooting at ducks in the pond, but the state dismissed this charge.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140(a)(2) — 1 case
Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “AS 11.61.140(2)(2). Sickel now appeals her conviction.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.61.140(g) — 1 case
Sickel v. State, 363 P.3d 115 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “AS 11.61.140(2)(2). Sickel now appeals her conviction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.