Alaska Stat. § 18.80.110
Investigation and conciliation
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 18.80.110. Investigation and conciliation.
The executive director or a member of the commission's staff designated by the executive director shall informally investigate the matters set out in a filed complaint, promptly and impartially. If the investigator determines that there is substantial evidence of an unlawful discriminatory practice under this chapter, the investigator shall immediately try to eliminate or remedy the discriminatory practice through an agreement reached by conference, conciliation, and persuasion. If an agreement is reached, it must be reduced to writing and signed by the complainant, executive director, and respondent. The agreement is binding and enforceable under this chapter as an order of the commission. An agreement reached under this section may include the compromise of damages authorized under this chapter.
The executive director or a member of the commission's staff designated by the executive director shall informally investigate the matters set out in a filed complaint, promptly and impartially. If the investigator determines that there is substantial evidence of an unlawful discriminatory practice under this chapter, the investigator shall immediately try to eliminate or remedy the discriminatory practice through an agreement reached by conference, conciliation, and persuasion. If an agreement is reached, it must be reduced to writing and signed by the complainant, executive director, and respondent. The agreement is binding and enforceable under this chapter as an order of the commission. An agreement reached under this section may include the compromise of damages authorized under this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1976–2020 · leading case: State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer
State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer (1995)
“” It consequently reversed the Commission’s decision and remanded “for *1368 further proceedings under AS 18.80.110 and, if appropriate, 18.80.120.”
McDaniel v. Cory (1981)
“[3] Pursuant to the administrative procedures set forth in AS 18.80.110, [4] her complaint was investigated by Karen Cory and Daveed Schwartz, Commission investigators.”
Toliver v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (2012)
“The investigatory duties of the Commission 4 are set out in the first sentence of AS 18.80.110: "The executive director or a member of the commission's staff designated by the executive director shall informally investigate the matters set out in a filed complaint, promptly and…”
Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. Anderson (2018)
“”7 “However, the records and information compiled by the [C]ommission during an investigation shall be available to the complainant or respondent .”
Hotel, Motel, Restaurant, Construction Camp Employees & Bartenders Union Local 879 v. Thomas (1976)
“20 In accordance with the mandatory language of AS 18.80.110, such a complaint will be investigated, and if substantial evidence of discrimination is found, the Commission must undertake the conciliation process on a classwide basis.”
Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (2008)
“AS 18.80.110. 14 . Id. 15 . AS 18.80.120.”
Grundberg v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (2012)
“2d 487, 492 (Alaska 1980); see also AS 18.80.110. 22 . Meyer, 906 P.2d at 1376 .”
Rodriguez v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (2015)
“AS 18.80.110. 10 . AS 18.80.112(a). 11 . See AS 18.”
Hotel & Restaurant Union Local 878 v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (1979)
“With respect to the authority of the executive director, AS 18.80.110 provides: The executive director or a member of the commission’s staff designated by the executive director shall informally investigate the matters set out in a filed complaint, promptly and impartially.”
Parson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE (2008)
“AS 18.80.110. If the investigator determines that the allegations are supported by substantial evidence, "the investigator shall immediately try to eliminate the discrimination complained of, by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.”
Grundberg v. Alaska State Communication for Human Rights (2014)
“CONCLUSION We agree with the Commission's legal determination that Grundberg's 2012 complaint in superior court was "based on the same facts" as her 2007 complaint to the Commission within the meaning of AS 18.”
Russell Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights and Federal Express Corporation (2020)
“And, as the 12 Relevant portions of the statute set out the investigation and conciliation structure (AS 18.80.110); describe the grounds on which the Commission can dismiss a complaint without prejudice (AS 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.