Alaska Stat. » Chapter 18.80
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 18.80.260 (2026)

Aiding, abetting, or coercing a violation of chapter

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 18.80.260. Aiding, abetting, or coercing a violation of chapter.
It is unlawful for a person to aid, abet, incite, compel, or coerce the doing of an act forbidden under this chapter or to attempt to do so.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375, 118 P.3d 1070 (Alaska 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375, 118 P.3d 1070 (Alaska 2005). · cites it 2× “Ellison’s Aiding and Abetting Discrimination Claims Ellison also argues that the union, Jackson, and Ballam aided and abetted discrimination in violation of AS 18.80.260. Ellison’s argument as to the union and the stewards is essentially the same argument she makes for liability…”
Norcon, Inc. v. Kotowski, 971 P.2d 158 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 2× “Norcon has not complied with this rule with respect to the exclusive remedy contention.”
Mills v. Hankla, 297 P.3d 158 (Alaska 2013). · cites it 2× “The court also concluded that if the City could be liable, then Chief Hankla could be personally liable under the aiding and abetting provision of AS 18.80.260. 2 As to Lt. Mills's wrongful constructive discharge claim, the court noted that Lt.”
Hout v. Nana Com. Catering, Etc., 638 P.2d 186 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 4× “[3] She alleges Brinkerhoff "coerced" NANA into discharging her in violation of AS 18.80.260. [4] A jury trial was held on the issue of liability.”
Mark Mancini v. City of Providence, 155 A.3d 159 (2017). “Alaska Stat. Ann. § 18.80.260 (West 2016) reads as follows: "It is unlawful for a person to aid, abet, incite, compel, or coerce the doing of an act forbidden under this chapter or to attempt to do so.”
Mark Mancini v. City of Providence (2017). “260 (West 2016) reads as follows: “It is unlawful for a person to aid, abet, incite, compel, or coerce the doing of an act forbidden under this chapter or to attempt to do so.” -9- supervisory employees—since such a regime would, in all likelihood, result in supervisors…”
Jaasi v. Dishman, 52 F. App'x 927 (9th Cir. 2002). “See Alaska Stat. § 18.80.260 (prohibiting persons from aiding, abetting, compelling or coercing discriminatory conduct).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.