Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 21.96.035 (2026)

Mandatory appraisal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 21.96.035. Mandatory appraisal.
A motor vehicle or similar policy, a policy providing property coverage, or any other policy providing first party property, casualty, or inland marine coverage, issued or delivered in this state, must include an appraisal clause providing a contractual means to resolve a dispute between the insured and the insurer over the value of a covered first party loss for real property, personal property, business property, or similar risks. If the insured and the insurer fail to agree on the amount of a covered first party loss, either may make written demand upon the other to submit the dispute for appraisal. Within 10 days of the written demand, the insured and insurer must notify the other of the competent appraiser each has selected. The two appraisers will promptly choose a competent and impartial umpire. Not later than 15 days after the umpire has been chosen, unless the time period is extended by the umpire, each appraiser will separately state in writing the amount of the loss. If the appraisers submit a written report of agreement on the amount of the loss, the agreed amount will be binding upon the insured and insurer. If the appraisers fail to agree, the appraisers will promptly submit their differences to the umpire. A decision agreed to by one of the appraisers and the umpire will be binding upon the insured and insurer. All expenses and fees, not including counsel or adjuster fees, incurred because of the appraisal shall be paid as determined by the umpire. Except as specifically provided, nothing in this section is intended to or shall in any manner limit or restrict the rights of insureds or insurers or confer any rights to an insured or insurer.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2023 · leading case: McDonnell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 299 P.3d 715 (Alaska 2013).
McDonnell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 299 P.3d 715 (Alaska 2013). · cites it 11× “1 She sought a declaratory judgment that the two-year limitation provision was unenforceable and that she was entitled to resolve her claims by appraisal under AS 21.96.035. 2 State Farm argued the two-year limitations period was a fully enforceable contract provision and the…”
Wright v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (D. Alaska 2023). · cites it 13× “” AS 21.96.035. Plaintiffs’ insurance policy contained an appraisal clause which provided, in relevant part, that [i]f you and we fail to agree on the amount of loss, either party can demand that the amount of the loss be set by appraisal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.