Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 36.30.150 (2026)
Bid acceptance and bid evaluation
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 36.30.150. Bid acceptance and bid evaluation.
(a) Bids shall be unconditionally accepted without alteration or correction, except as authorized in AS 36.30.160. The procurement officer shall evaluate bids based on the requirements set out in the invitation to bid, which may include criteria to determine acceptability such as inspection, testing, quality, delivery, and suitability for a particular purpose. The criteria that will affect the bid price and be considered in evaluation for award must be objectively measurable, such as discounts, transportation costs, and total or life cycle costs. The invitation to bid must set out the evaluation criteria to be used. Criteria may not be used in bid evaluation if they are not set out in the invitation to bid.
(b) [Repealed, § 11 ch 37 SLA 1993.]
(a) Bids shall be unconditionally accepted without alteration or correction, except as authorized in AS 36.30.160. The procurement officer shall evaluate bids based on the requirements set out in the invitation to bid, which may include criteria to determine acceptability such as inspection, testing, quality, delivery, and suitability for a particular purpose. The criteria that will affect the bid price and be considered in evaluation for award must be objectively measurable, such as discounts, transportation costs, and total or life cycle costs. The invitation to bid must set out the evaluation criteria to be used. Criteria may not be used in bid evaluation if they are not set out in the invitation to bid.
(b) [Repealed, § 11 ch 37 SLA 1993.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Lakloey, Inc. v. Univ. of Alaska, 141 P.3d 317 (Alaska 2006).
Lakloey, Inc. v. Univ. of Alaska, 141 P.3d 317 (Alaska 2006). “Lakloey’s appeal argued that Addendum #2 (1) violated the instructions to bidders; (2) violated AS 36.30.150(a) by introducing a “subjective and nebulous” insurance requirement; (3) violated AS 36.”
— Alaska Stat. § 36.30.150(a) — 1 case
Lakloey, Inc. v. Univ. of Alaska, 141 P.3d 317 (Alaska 2006). “Lakloey’s appeal argued that Addendum #2 (1) violated the instructions to bidders; (2) violated AS 36.30.150(a) by introducing a “subjective and nebulous” insurance requirement; (3) violated AS 36.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.