Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 44.77.020 (2026)
Disallowance by officer
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 44.77.020. Disallowance by officer.
(a) If the administrative or executive officer disallows all or part of the claim, the claimant may obtain a review of the officer's action by applying within 60 days to the Department of Administration, at Juneau, orally or in writing.
(b) When the application is made, the officer who disallowed the claim shall transmit the claim and all papers and memoranda relating to the claim to the Department of Administration.
(c) When it receives the claim, papers, and memoranda, the department shall reexamine the merits of the claim.
(d) The department may adopt procedure consistent with law, and shall make its decision affirming, modifying, or reversing the action of the officer. The decision may be oral or written if made in the presence of the claimant; otherwise it must be written.
(a) If the administrative or executive officer disallows all or part of the claim, the claimant may obtain a review of the officer's action by applying within 60 days to the Department of Administration, at Juneau, orally or in writing.
(b) When the application is made, the officer who disallowed the claim shall transmit the claim and all papers and memoranda relating to the claim to the Department of Administration.
(c) When it receives the claim, papers, and memoranda, the department shall reexamine the merits of the claim.
(d) The department may adopt procedure consistent with law, and shall make its decision affirming, modifying, or reversing the action of the officer. The decision may be oral or written if made in the presence of the claimant; otherwise it must be written.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–1993 · leading case: State v. Dupere, 709 P.2d 493 (Alaska 1986).
State v. Dupere, 709 P.2d 493 (Alaska 1986). “AS 44.77.020. The Department then makes a decision which the claimant can appeal at a hearing.”
State, Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Transamerica Premier Ins. Co., 856 P.2d 766 (Alaska 1993). “In late June Blanas appealed this decision to the Department of Administration, pursuant to AS 44.77.020(a). 2 In addition to his claim for extra costs, Blanas sought up to $242,000 in consequential damages, arguing that the debts that he incurred on the project destroyed his…”
State, Dept. of Nat. Res. v. Transamerica, 856 P.2d 766 (Alaska 1993). “In late June Blanas appealed this decision to the Department of Administration, pursuant to AS 44.77.020(a). [2] In addition to his claim for extra costs, Blanas sought up to $242,000 in consequential damages, arguing that the debts that he incurred on the project destroyed his…”
State, Alaska Court Sys. Admin. Off. of the Courts v. Law Offices of Coleman & Iacopelli, 716 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1986). “Appellees should be given a reasonable time in which to initiate the administrative review process contemplated by AS 44.77.020. This, rather than dismissal on the grounds that the appellees did not exhaust their administrative remedies, is appropriate because the appellees have…”
— Alaska Stat. § 44.77.020(a) — 3 cases
State, Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Transamerica Premier Ins. Co., 856 P.2d 766 (Alaska 1993). “In late June Blanas appealed this decision to the Department of Administration, pursuant to AS 44.77.020(a). 2 In addition to his claim for extra costs, Blanas sought up to $242,000 in consequential damages, arguing that the debts that he incurred on the project destroyed his…”
State, Dept. of Nat. Res. v. Transamerica, 856 P.2d 766 (Alaska 1993). “In late June Blanas appealed this decision to the Department of Administration, pursuant to AS 44.77.020(a). [2] In addition to his claim for extra costs, Blanas sought up to $242,000 in consequential damages, arguing that the debts that he incurred on the project destroyed his…”
State, Alaska Court Sys. Admin. Off. of the Courts v. Law Offices of Coleman & Iacopelli, 716 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1986). “Appellees should be given a reasonable time in which to initiate the administrative review process contemplated by AS 44.77.020. This, rather than dismissal on the grounds that the appellees did not exhaust their administrative remedies, is appropriate because the appellees have…”
— Alaska Stat. § 44.77.020(b) — 1 case
State v. Dupere, 709 P.2d 493 (Alaska 1986). “AS 44.77.020. The Department then makes a decision which the claimant can appeal at a hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.