Alaska Stat. § 47.10.005
Construction
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 47.10.005. Construction.
The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to
(1) achieve the end that a child coming within the jurisdiction of the court under this chapter may receive the care, guidance, treatment, and control that will promote the child's welfare and the parents' participation in the upbringing of the child to the fullest extent consistent with the child's best interests; and
(2) follow the findings set out in AS 47.06.030.
The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to
(1) achieve the end that a child coming within the jurisdiction of the court under this chapter may receive the care, guidance, treatment, and control that will promote the child's welfare and the parents' participation in the upbringing of the child to the fullest extent consistent with the child's best interests; and
(2) follow the findings set out in AS 47.06.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: Dara S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
Dara S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“92 And in 2005 the legislature modified AS 47.10.005, in relevant part, to clarify that statutes in AS 47.”
State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services v. Michelle P (2018)
“The 4 emergency custody situations contemplated in AS 47.”
Kiva O. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“The administration of Lexapro is in Alec’s best interests. a. The Myers best interests factors In Myers, after concluding that the State had a compelling interest that could justify interference in the patient’s fundamental rights, we laid out a “constitutional balancing test”…”
State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS v. Zander B & Kelly B. (Foster Parents) (2020)
“102 OCS “shall place the child” with an adult family member “in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of good cause to the contrary.”
Diego K. and Catharine K. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“" AS 47.10.005(1). Congress passed ICWA to address the "alarmingly high percentage of Indian families .”
Miranda T. v. State of Alaska DHSS, OCS (2023)
“In this case the parties had numerous hearings on a variety of matters involving Bishope’s best interests; agreements by some, but not all, of the parties attempted to control her placement for some periods of time; and, in the face of ultimate disagreements about her placement…”
Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“45 AS 47.10.005(1). 46 CINA Rule 1(c). 47 In re K.”
Theresa L. v. State, Dept. of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2015)
“AS 47.10.005(1). 30 . AS 47.10.990(21); AS 47.”
Tuluksak Native Community v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS (2023)
“26 For children needing intensive mental health services, it is important that OCS be able to efficiently place those children at facilities that provide appropriate levels of care.”
Doug Y. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2010)
“For example, Howard related an interaction with Damien in May 2009 where he "drew a picture of [himself] and his father, [and] described a dream in which he was assaulted by .”
Rowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2015)
“See AS 47.10.005 ("'The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to .”
Jennifer L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2015)
“080(c) ("If the court finds the child is a child in need of aid, the court shall .”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.005(1) — 7 cases
Diego K. and Catharine K. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“" AS 47.10.005(1). Congress passed ICWA to address the "alarmingly high percentage of Indian families .”
Miranda T. v. State of Alaska DHSS, OCS (2023)
“In this case the parties had numerous hearings on a variety of matters involving Bishope’s best interests; agreements by some, but not all, of the parties attempted to control her placement for some periods of time; and, in the face of ultimate disagreements about her placement…”
Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“45 AS 47.10.005(1). 46 CINA Rule 1(c). 47 In re K.”
Theresa L. v. State, Dept. of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2015)
“AS 47.10.005(1). 30 . AS 47.10.990(21); AS 47.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.005(1)(a) — 1 case
Kiva O. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“The administration of Lexapro is in Alec’s best interests. a. The Myers best interests factors In Myers, after concluding that the State had a compelling interest that could justify interference in the patient’s fundamental rights, we laid out a “constitutional balancing test”…”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.005(a) — 1 case
State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services v. Michelle P (2018)
“The 4 emergency custody situations contemplated in AS 47.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.005(l)(a) — 1 case
Kiva O. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (2018)
“The administration of Lexapro is in Alec’s best interests. a. The Myers best interests factors In Myers, after concluding that the State had a compelling interest that could justify interference in the patient’s fundamental rights, we laid out a “constitutional balancing test”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.