Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 47.10.060 (2026)
Waiver of jurisdiction. [Repealed, § 55 ch 59 SLA 1996. For current law as to an alleged delinquent minor, see
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 47.10.060. Waiver of jurisdiction. [Repealed, § 55 ch 59 SLA 1996. For current law as to an alleged delinquent minor, see AS 47.12.100.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 59
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: In re F. S., 586 P.2d 607 (Alaska 1978).
In re F. S., 586 P.2d 607 (Alaska 1978). “decision, AS 47.10.060 provided “[a] minor is una-menable to treatment .”
P. H. v. State, 504 P.2d 837 (Alaska 1972). “The waiver procedure set out in AS 47.10.060 and Children’s Rule 3 provides the means by which the children’s court judge determines, prior to adjudicating the delinquency petition, that an accused child is not a suitable subject for the treatment available for child offenders.”
D. H. v. State, 561 P.2d 294 (Alaska 1977). “2d 837, 845-46 (Alaska 1972), we read AS 47.10.060 so as to require the court in most cases to go beyond the circumstances surrounding the alleged delinquent acts and the age of the child.”
Brown v. State, 693 P.2d 324 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “See AS 47.10.060. See, e.g., State v. F.L.A., 608 P.”
Davenport v. McGinnis, 522 P.2d 1140 (Alaska 1974). “AS 47.10.060. If he is found to be unamenable to treatment and there is probable cause to believe that he is delinquent, jurisdiction of the children's court is waived and a criminal prosecution may be initiated.”
R.H. v. State, 777 P.2d 204 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “’s arrest for the shooting, the state filed a petition for waiver of children’s court jurisdiction, pursuant to AS 47.10.060(a). In support of its petition, the state requested a psychiatric evaluation of R.”
W.M.F. v. State, 723 P.2d 1298 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). “2d 441, 443-44 (Alaska 1970) (goals of adult sentencing); AS 47.10.060(a), (d); Alaska R. Children’s P.”
J. W. H. v. State, 583 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1978). “This is an appeal from a decision of the superior court waiving juvenile jurisdiction over appellant pursuant to the provisions of AS 47.10.060 1 and Rule 3, Alaska R. Chil *228 dren’s P.”
State v. Ladd, 951 P.2d 1220 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998). “Under the juvenile waiver statute — former AS 47.10.060(f)(2) and current AS 47.12.100(e)(2) — when a minor under the age of 16 is charged with an unclassified felony or a class A felony against a person, and the State petitions the superior court to waive its juvenile…”
State v. F. L. A., 608 P.2d 12 (Alaska 1980). “AS 47.10.060(a) states: If the court finds at a hearing on a petition that there is probable cause for believing that a minor is delinquent and finds that the minor is not amenable to treatment under this chapter, it shall order the case closed.”
J. R. v. State, 616 P.2d 865 (Alaska 1980). “, a seventeen-year-old male accused of murdering and robbing two Anchorage taxicab drivers in December 1979, has appealed a decision of the superior court finding him unamenable to treatment as a juvenile and waiving the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to AS…”
Perotti v. State, 806 P.2d 325 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “After commencing juvenile delinquency proceedings against Per-otti for murder in the first degree, kidnapping, robbery in the first degree, tampering with physical evidence, and theft in the third degree, the state petitioned for waiver of juvenile jurisdiction pursuant to AS…”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.060(a) — 29 cases
R.H. v. State, 777 P.2d 204 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “’s arrest for the shooting, the state filed a petition for waiver of children’s court jurisdiction, pursuant to AS 47.10.060(a). In support of its petition, the state requested a psychiatric evaluation of R.”
Henson v. State, 576 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1978).
In re F. S., 586 P.2d 607 (Alaska 1978). “decision, AS 47.10.060 provided “[a] minor is una-menable to treatment .”
D. H. v. State, 561 P.2d 294 (Alaska 1977). “2d 837, 845-46 (Alaska 1972), we read AS 47.10.060 so as to require the court in most cases to go beyond the circumstances surrounding the alleged delinquent acts and the age of the child.”
P. H. v. State, 504 P.2d 837 (Alaska 1972). “The waiver procedure set out in AS 47.10.060 and Children’s Rule 3 provides the means by which the children’s court judge determines, prior to adjudicating the delinquency petition, that an accused child is not a suitable subject for the treatment available for child offenders.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.060(d) — 29 cases
In re F. S., 586 P.2d 607 (Alaska 1978). “decision, AS 47.10.060 provided “[a] minor is una-menable to treatment .”
P. H. v. State, 504 P.2d 837 (Alaska 1972). “The waiver procedure set out in AS 47.10.060 and Children’s Rule 3 provides the means by which the children’s court judge determines, prior to adjudicating the delinquency petition, that an accused child is not a suitable subject for the treatment available for child offenders.”
D. H. v. State, 561 P.2d 294 (Alaska 1977). “2d 837, 845-46 (Alaska 1972), we read AS 47.10.060 so as to require the court in most cases to go beyond the circumstances surrounding the alleged delinquent acts and the age of the child.”
J. R. v. State, 616 P.2d 865 (Alaska 1980). “, a seventeen-year-old male accused of murdering and robbing two Anchorage taxicab drivers in December 1979, has appealed a decision of the superior court finding him unamenable to treatment as a juvenile and waiving the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to AS…”
State v. F. L. A., 608 P.2d 12 (Alaska 1980). “AS 47.10.060(a) states: If the court finds at a hearing on a petition that there is probable cause for believing that a minor is delinquent and finds that the minor is not amenable to treatment under this chapter, it shall order the case closed.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.060(f)(2) — 1 case
State v. Ladd, 951 P.2d 1220 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998). “Under the juvenile waiver statute — former AS 47.10.060(f)(2) and current AS 47.12.100(e)(2) — when a minor under the age of 16 is charged with an unclassified felony or a class A felony against a person, and the State petitions the superior court to waive its juvenile…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.