Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 10-1430 (2026)

Grounds for judicial dissolution or equitable relief

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The court may dissolve a corporation in a proceeding by the attorney general if it is established that either:

1. The corporation obtained its articles of incorporation through fraud.

2. The corporation has continued to exceed or abuse the authority conferred on it by law.

B. The court may dissolve a corporation in a proceeding by a shareholder if it is established that either:

1. The directors are deadlocked in the management of the corporate affairs, the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock and irreparable injury to the corporation is threatened or being suffered or the business and affairs of the corporation cannot be conducted to the advantage of the shareholders generally because of the deadlock.

2. The directors or those in control of the corporation have acted, are acting or will act in a manner that is illegal, oppressive or fraudulent.

3. The shareholders are deadlocked in voting power and have failed for a period that includes at least two consecutive annual meeting dates to elect one or more directors.

4. The corporate assets are being wasted, misapplied or diverted for noncorporate purposes.

C. The court may dissolve a corporation in a proceeding by a creditor if it is established that either:

1. The creditor's claim has been reduced to a judgment, the execution of the judgment has been returned unsatisfied and the corporation is insolvent.

2. The corporation has admitted in writing that the creditor's claim is due and owing and the corporation is insolvent.

D. The court may dissolve a corporation in a proceeding by the corporation to have its voluntary dissolution continued under court supervision.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2014 · leading case: Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Mgmt. Corp., 335 P.3d 530 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Mgmt. Corp., 335 P.3d 530 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “¶ 18 Gries began dissolution proceedings of PDR under A.R.S. § 10-1430 claiming director deadlock.”

Scott v. Trans-Sys., Inc., 148 Wash. 2d 701 (Wash. 2003). “Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 10-1430 (B)(2), (4) (1996); 805 III.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 10-1430(B)(1) — 1 case

Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Mgmt. Corp., 335 P.3d 530 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “¶ 18 Gries began dissolution proceedings of PDR under A.R.S. § 10-1430 claiming director deadlock.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.