Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-361 (2026)

Definition of program

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purposes of this article, unless the context otherwise requires, "program" means a special supervision program in which the county attorney of a participating county may divert or defer, before a guilty plea or a trial, the prosecution of a person who is accused of committing a crime.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Dustin Gill, 391 P.3d 1193 (Ariz. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Arizona v. Dustin Gill, 391 P.3d 1193 (Ariz. 2017). · cites it 2× “]” AR.S. § 11-361. A defendant participates in this supervision program before “a guilty plea or a trial,” and so it is a type of pretrial diversion.”
State v. Valenzuela, 695 P.2d 732 (Ariz. 1985). · cites it 2× “164, § 31, now codified as a note following A.R.S. § 11-361. 1. Credits — Old Code Under the old code, prisoners could earn reduction of their sentence by either of two methods.”
State v. Sirny, 772 P.2d 1145 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Even though the mechanics were in place for deferred prosecution in Arizona, see A.R.S. § 11-361 (Supp.1988) and Rule 38, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Arizona legislature enacted a specific statute to deal with domestic violence.”
State v. LaBarre, 610 P.2d 1058 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “§ 11-361, as amended) states: Except for section 30, the provisions of this act do not apply to or govern the construction of and punishment for any offense committed prior to the effective date of this act, or the construction and application of any defense to a prosecution for…”
In Re Connelly, 55 P.3d 756 (Ariz. 2002). · cites it 2× “” Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 11-361 (2001). 2 . "A discipline proceeding commences upon receipt by the state bar of a charge against a respondent.”
State v. Gill, 377 P.3d 1024 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “After the State reduced the charge to a misdemeanor, and Gill rejected plea offers, the parties agreed that the prosecution would be deferred while Gill participated in a TASC program.”
Brewer v. Rees, 265 P.3d 436 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “1, which was adopted to implement the deferred prosecution program authorized by AR.S. § 11-361, contemplates the suspension of time limits required by Rule 8.”
Marvin Roberts v. City of Fairbanks, 962 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2020). “891 (confirming that criminal charges will be dismissed with prejudice when a defendant fulfills the requirements of a diversion agreement); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-361 (“[T]he county attorney of a participating county may divert or defer, before a guilty plea or a trial, the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.