Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-931 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Governing body" means the board of supervisors of a county, or the council or other governing body of a municipality, as the case may be.

2. "Municipality" means an incorporated city or town.

3. "Public park" means a park, parkway, trail, recreational area or playground established, maintained or administered by a county, city or town.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2012 · leading case: Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 11-931(3) (2012). ¶ 64 In finding that the area the County has designated as Anza Park, which includes and suiTOunds the MWRF, is indeed a park, the superior court made over one hundred findings and conclusions, including: 87.”
City of Phoenix v. Harnish, 150 P.3d 245 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “2000); see also A.R.S. § 11-931 (2001) (defining a public park for county purposes as “a park, parkway, trail, recreational area or playground established, maintained or administered by a county, city or town”).”
Johnson v. Mohave Cnty., 78 P.3d 1051 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 11-931 to -941 (2001). II. The attorneys’ fees award was improper ¶ 16 The trial court awarded attorneys’ fees to the City and the County pursuant to § 12-349(A)(1), which mandates an award of fees against a party who brings a claim without substantial…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-931(3) — 1 case
Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “” A.R.S. § 11-931(3) (2012). ¶ 64 In finding that the area the County has designated as Anza Park, which includes and suiTOunds the MWRF, is indeed a park, the superior court made over one hundred findings and conclusions, including: 87.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.