Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1117
Complaint
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The complaint shall set forth:
1. The name of the person asserting the public use for which the property is sought, as plaintiff.
2. The names of all owners and claimants of the property, if known, or a statement that they are unknown, as defendants.
3. A statement of the right of plaintiff.
4. If a right of way for a road, ditch, canal or other purpose is sought, the location and general route, accompanied with a map thereof.
5. A description of each piece of land sought to be taken, and whether the land includes the whole or only a part of an entire parcel or tract.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1965–2015 · leading case: Catalina Foothills Unified School District No. 16 v. La Paloma Property Owners Ass'n
Catalina Foothills Unified School District No. 16 v. La Paloma Property Owners Ass'n (2015)
“See A.R.S. § 12-1117(2) (2015) (condemnation complaint shall set forth “[t]he names of all owners and claimants of the property, if known, or a statement that they are unknown, as defen *518 dants”).”
City of Phoenix v. Donofrio (1965)
“*136 A.R.S. § 12-1117 (1956) states a complaint in condemnation shall set forth: “1.”
City of Scottsdale v. CGP-Aberdeen, L.L.C. (2008)
“See A.R.S. §§ 12-1117(5); 12-1116(H). ¶ 17 Second, the statute authorizes, but does not compel, the government to seek immediate possession of the property at the time that it files a condemnation action.”
Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman (1971)
“Holmes, supra, that special benefits are an ingredient of the measure of damages in eminent domain actions and need not be pleaded.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1117(2) — 1 case
Catalina Foothills Unified School District No. 16 v. La Paloma Property Owners Ass'n (2015)
“See A.R.S. § 12-1117(2) (2015) (condemnation complaint shall set forth “[t]he names of all owners and claimants of the property, if known, or a statement that they are unknown, as defen *518 dants”).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1117(5) — 1 case
City of Scottsdale v. CGP-Aberdeen, L.L.C. (2008)
“See A.R.S. §§ 12-1117(5); 12-1116(H). ¶ 17 Second, the statute authorizes, but does not compel, the government to seek immediate possession of the property at the time that it files a condemnation action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.