Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1126 (2026)

Final order of condemnation; recording; vesting of property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. When the final judgment has been satisfied and all unpaid property taxes which were levied as of the date of the order for immediate possession, including penalties and interest, on the property that is the subject of the condemnation action have been paid, the court shall make a final order of condemnation, describing the property condemned and the purposes of the condemnation.

B. A copy of the order shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county or counties in which the property is located, and thereupon the property described shall vest in plaintiff for the purposes therein specified.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1959–2019 · leading case: Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 6× “§ 12-1124 (in an eminent domain proceeding, the court “shall set aside and annul the entire proceeding[]” when the condemnee is unable to collect payment). “When the final judgment has been satisfied .”
State v. Helm, 345 P.2d 202 (Ariz. 1959). · cites it 4× “section 12-1126 provides as follows: "A. When the final judgment has been satisfied, the court shall make a final order of condemnation, describing the property condemned and the purposes of the condemnation.”
Ziggy's Opportunities, Inc. v. I-10 Indus. Park Developers, 730 P.2d 281 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 12-1116) was entered in October 1981, and a final order of condemnation (A.R.S. § 12-1126) was entered pursuant to stipulation between the State and I—10 in July 1982.”
State Ex Rel. Mendez v. Am. SUPPORT, 100 P.3d 932 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “Next, when payments *941 for compensation and damages are made to the defendant or deposited in court for distribution to the defendant, the statute requires that all unpaid property taxes shall be paid.”
City of Yuma v. Arizona Water Co., 522 P.2d 765 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974). “§ 12-1126, as amended, provides that when the final judgment has been satisfied, the court shall make a final order of condemnation, describing the property condemned and the purposes of the condemnation, and that when a copy of that order is recorded with the county recorder…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1126(A) — 1 case
Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 12-1124 (in an eminent domain proceeding, the court “shall set aside and annul the entire proceeding[]” when the condemnee is unable to collect payment). “When the final judgment has been satisfied .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1126(B) — 1 case
Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 12-1124 (in an eminent domain proceeding, the court “shall set aside and annul the entire proceeding[]” when the condemnee is unable to collect payment). “When the final judgment has been satisfied .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.