Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-116.07 (2026)

Assessments for dangerous crimes against children and sexual offenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-116.07. Assessments for dangerous crimes against children and sexual offenses

A. In addition to any other assessment or restitution, if a person is convicted of a dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705 or a violation of section 13-1404, 13-1405, 13-1406 or 13-3212, the court shall order the person to pay an assessment of $500.  The assessment shall not be waived and is not subject to a surcharge.

B. The court shall transmit the monies collected pursuant to this section to the county treasurer for the purpose of defraying the cost of investigations pursuant to section 13-1414.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Stephen Vincent Haverstick, 318 P.3d 877 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Arizona v. Stephen Vincent Haverstick, 318 P.3d 877 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “Consequently, we are not persuaded by his argument. Assessments ¶ 9 Haverstick next argues the tidal court erred by ordering him to pay a $250 assessment to the “Sex Offender Monitoring Fund” pursuant to AR.”
State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland, 509 P.3d 412 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “15 Copeland also challenges as fundamental error the trial court’s imposition of fifty assessments pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-116.07, one for each of his convictions.”
State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “15 Copeland also challenges as fundamental error the trial court’s imposition of fifty assessments pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-116.07, one for each of his convictions.”
State v. Torres (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). “Any amount Torres has paid for the benefit of the YCAO more than the $500 authorized by § 12-116.07 for reimbursement of costs associated with the victim’s forensic medical examination shall be refunded to him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.