12-1567. Satisfaction of judgment; superior court; filing procedures; hearing; bond
A. The prevailing party shall file a satisfaction of judgment in the superior court within forty days after a judgment has been paid in full.
B. If the prevailing party fails to file a satisfaction of judgment or cannot be located after the opposing party has exercised due diligence in attempting to locate the prevailing party, the opposing party may file a motion to compel satisfaction of the judgment. The opposing party shall include with the motion to compel satisfaction of the judgment an affidavit that evidences proof of payment and, if necessary, the due diligence that was performed in attempting to locate the prevailing party. If the motion is granted, the judgment is deemed satisfied.
C. A judge may hold a hearing on the motion to compel satisfaction of the judgment.
D. A judge may compel the moving party to post a bond with the court in the amount of the judgment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case (
1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case:
Wright v. Pandora (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
Wright v. Pandora (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 10× “The superior court properly denied Judgment Debtors’ motion to compel satisfaction of judgment because they failed to meet their burden under A.R.S. § 12-1567. III. Sheriff’s Sales ¶18 Judgment Debtors next argue the sheriff’s sales should be set aside because the properties…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1567(A) — 1 case
Wright v. Pandora (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“The superior court properly denied Judgment Debtors’ motion to compel satisfaction of judgment because they failed to meet their burden under A.R.S. § 12-1567. III. Sheriff’s Sales ¶18 Judgment Debtors next argue the sheriff’s sales should be set aside because the properties…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1567(B) — 1 case
Wright v. Pandora (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“The superior court properly denied Judgment Debtors’ motion to compel satisfaction of judgment because they failed to meet their burden under A.R.S. § 12-1567. III. Sheriff’s Sales ¶18 Judgment Debtors next argue the sheriff’s sales should be set aside because the properties…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1567(C) — 1 case
Wright v. Pandora (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“The superior court properly denied Judgment Debtors’ motion to compel satisfaction of judgment because they failed to meet their burden under A.R.S. § 12-1567. III. Sheriff’s Sales ¶18 Judgment Debtors next argue the sheriff’s sales should be set aside because the properties…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.