A. When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding that involves the validity of a municipal ordinance or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard. In any proceeding in which a state statute, ordinance, franchise or rule is alleged to be unconstitutional, the attorney general and the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate shall be served with a copy of the pleading, motion or document containing the allegation at the same time the other parties in the action are served and shall be entitled to be heard.
B. If a pleading, motion or document containing the allegation is served on the attorney general and the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate pursuant to subsection A, a notice of claim of unconstitutionality shall be attached to the pleading, motion or document as the cover page and shall state the following information:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the attorney for the party alleging that a state law is unconstitutional or the name, address and telephone number of the party if the party is not represented by an attorney.
2. The case name, court name, caption and case number of the proceeding.
3. A brief statement of the basis for the claim of unconstitutionality.
4. A brief description of the proceeding, with copies of any court orders in the proceeding if the claim of unconstitutionality is asserted in a pleading, motion or document other than the pleading, motion or document that initiated the proceeding.
5. The date, time, location, judge and subject of the next hearing in the proceeding, if any.
C. If the attorney general or the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate are not served in a timely manner with notice pursuant to subsection A, on motion by the attorney general, the speaker of the house of representatives or the president of the senate the court shall vacate any finding of unconstitutionality and shall give the attorney general, the speaker of the house of representatives or the president of the senate a reasonable opportunity to prepare and be heard.
D. This section shall not be construed to compel the attorney general, the speaker of the house of representatives or the president of the senate to intervene as a party in any proceeding or to permit them to be named as defendants in a proceeding. The attorney general, the speaker of the house of representatives or the president of the senate, in the party's discretion, may intervene as a party, may file briefs in the matter or may choose not to participate in a proceeding that is subject to the notice requirements of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
52
cases (
9 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case:
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 59× “§ 12-1841 to specify what must be served on the Attorney General and when.”
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Block, 942 P.2d 428 (Ariz. 1997).
· cites it 12× “A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp.1996). The statute imposing this requirement was recently amended to provide that if the Attorney General is not timely served with the proper notice, the court, upon motion by the Attorney General, "shall vacate any finding of unconstitutionality and…”
Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., 873 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (D. Ariz. 2012).
· cites it 13× “28 at 5) Relying upon A.R.S. §§ 12-1841 and -1843 only, Plaintiff argues she “[w]as required to name all persons with any interest that would be affected by the declaratory judgment as parties .”
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano, 160 P.3d 1216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp.2006). Accordingly, Arizona courts have uniformly held that the Arizona Attorney General is an appropriate party to such cases because the Attorney General’s participation is authorized by the Declaratory Judgments Act itself.”
Grammatico v. Indus. Comm'n, 90 P.3d 211 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 12-1841 (2003) (providing Attorney General must be given opportunity to address constitutional challenges to state statutes).”
Bohn v. Waddell, 790 P.2d 772 (Ariz. T.C. 1990).
· cites it 6× “Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1841 and the doctrine of virtual representation, the Court directs the Department of Revenue to treat all persons who paid Arizona income tax on federal pensions for tax years 1984 through 1988 as though each such person were a Plaintiff herein.”
Arpaio v. Citizen Publ'g Co., 211 P.3d 8 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 12-1841 (A). Indeed, our legislature considered and rejected an amendment to § 39-121.”
Arpaio v. Maricopa Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 238 P.3d 626 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 3× “Appellants named the State in their amended complaint, pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp. 2009). Section 12-1841(A) states, "When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration^]" Other…”
DeVries v. State, 211 P.3d 1185 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 3× “In a separate opinion involving the parties to this appeal, we addressed the applicability of A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp.2008). DeVries v. State, 219 Ariz.”
Green v. Garriott, 212 P.3d 96 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “NOTES [1] In a separate opinion involving the parties to this appeal, we addressed the applicability of A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp.2008). See DeVries v.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1841(0) — 2 cases
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“§ 12-1841 to specify what must be served on the Attorney General and when.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1841(A) — 17 cases
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“§ 12-1841 to specify what must be served on the Attorney General and when.”
Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., 873 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (D. Ariz. 2012).
“28 at 5) Relying upon A.R.S. §§ 12-1841 and -1843 only, Plaintiff argues she “[w]as required to name all persons with any interest that would be affected by the declaratory judgment as parties .”
Arpaio v. Citizen Publ'g Co., 211 P.3d 8 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“See A.R.S. § 12-1841 (A). Indeed, our legislature considered and rejected an amendment to § 39-121.”
Arpaio v. Maricopa Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 238 P.3d 626 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
“Appellants named the State in their amended complaint, pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1841 (Supp. 2009). Section 12-1841(A) states, "When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration^]" Other…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1841(B) — 1 case
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“§ 12-1841 to specify what must be served on the Attorney General and when.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1841(C) — 3 cases
DeVries v. State, 198 P.3d 580 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“§ 12-1841 to specify what must be served on the Attorney General and when.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1841(D) — 5 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.