Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2231 (2026)

Husband and wife; antimarital fact

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In a civil action a husband shall not be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, except as provided in section 12-2232.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1970–2008 · leading case: Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980).
Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980). · cites it 2× “The remaining 17 States have abolished the privilege in criminal cases: see Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-2231 (Supp. 1978); Ark.”
In re MH 2007-000937, 189 P.3d 1090 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 20× “§ 12-2231, which provides as follows: “In a civil action a husband shall not be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, except as provided in paragraphs 1 through 4 of § 12-2232.”
Blazek v. Superior Court, 869 P.2d 509 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “”) §§ 12-2231 to -2232 (1982) 4 ; AR.S. § 13-4062.”
Ulibarri v. Superior Ct. Cty. of Coconino, 909 P.2d 449 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “section 12-2231, the anti-marital fact statute, provides: "In a civil action a husband shall not be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent.”
Murphy v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cnty., 689 P.2d 532 (Ariz. 1984). · cites it 2× “Title 12, article 4 (A.R.S. §§ 12-2231 through 12-2237) [husband-wife, clergyman-penitent, doctor-patient, and reporter-informant privileges].”
State v. Freeman, 276 S.E.2d 450 (N.C. 1981). “Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 12-2231 ,12-2232 (1956 & Supp.”
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Superior Court, 764 P.2d 759 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “…privileges codified in title 12, chapter 13, art. 4 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The others are husband and wife (§§ 12-2231, 2232), attorney and client (§ 12-2234), physician and patient (§ 12-2235), and reporter and informant (§ 12-2237). 3 Each of these statutory…”
Fish v. Indus. Comm'n, 472 P.2d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 12-2231 is the first of a series of code sections under the heading “Privileged Communications”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.