Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2410 (2026)

Hearing; procedure; issues

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Upon filing of a request for hearing pursuant to section 12-2407, the party seeking any provisional remedy or the court shall cause the matter to be set for hearing.

B. Hearing shall be before a judge or justice of the peace and shall be heard no later than five days exclusive of weekends or holidays after the filing of a request for a hearing date, or at a later time with the consent of all parties.

C. Any hearing on an application for any provisional remedy shall be limited to the following issues:

1. The probable validity of the applicant's claim or claims and any defenses and claims of personal property exemptions of the party against whom such provisional remedy will operate.

2. The existence of any statutory requirements for the issuance of any provisional remedies sought.

D. If after hearing the court finds probable cause to believe the claim of the applicant is valid and that the statutory requirements for any provisional remedy have been met, such remedy shall be issued forthwith.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Granmo v. Super. Ct. in & for Pima Cty., 596 P.2d 36 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Granmo v. Super. Ct. in & for Pima Cty., 596 P.2d 36 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 3× “The hearing on petitioner’s application for a writ of attachment was held pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2410. Subsection (C) provides: “Any hearing on an application for any provisional remedy shall be limited to the following issues: 1.”
Offen Petroleum LLC v. L&J Express, LLC, et al. (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 9× “” 16 A.R.S. § 12-2410(C). “If after hearing the court finds probable cause to believe the claim 17 of the applicant is valid and that the statutory requirements for any provisional remedy 18 have been met, such remedy shall be issued forthwith.”
yauck/alt v. West Town (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 6× “See A.R.S. § 12-2410. The day before the hearing, West Town filed a verification (the “Verification”) stating: 1.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). · cites it 3× “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 12 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 13 a pre-judgment writ.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). · cites it 3× “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 13 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 14 a pre-judgment writ.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2410(C) — 5 cases
Granmo v. Super. Ct. in & for Pima Cty., 596 P.2d 36 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). “The hearing on petitioner’s application for a writ of attachment was held pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2410. Subsection (C) provides: “Any hearing on an application for any provisional remedy shall be limited to the following issues: 1.”
Offen Petroleum LLC v. L&J Express, LLC, et al. (D. Ariz. 2025). “” 16 A.R.S. § 12-2410(C). “If after hearing the court finds probable cause to believe the claim 17 of the applicant is valid and that the statutory requirements for any provisional remedy 18 have been met, such remedy shall be issued forthwith.”
yauck/alt v. West Town (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025). “See A.R.S. § 12-2410. The day before the hearing, West Town filed a verification (the “Verification”) stating: 1.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 12 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 13 a pre-judgment writ.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 13 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 14 a pre-judgment writ.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2410(C)(1) — 1 case
yauck/alt v. West Town (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025). “See A.R.S. § 12-2410. The day before the hearing, West Town filed a verification (the “Verification”) stating: 1.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2410(D) — 3 cases
Offen Petroleum LLC v. L&J Express, LLC, et al. (D. Ariz. 2025). “” 16 A.R.S. § 12-2410(C). “If after hearing the court finds probable cause to believe the claim 17 of the applicant is valid and that the statutory requirements for any provisional remedy 18 have been met, such remedy shall be issued forthwith.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 12 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 13 a pre-judgment writ.”
CNA Nat'l Warranty Corp. v. RHN Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). “§ 12-2410(C). The purpose of the hearing “is to afford 13 a defendant an opportunity to attack the validity of the plaintiff’s claim before issuance of 14 a pre-judgment writ.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.