Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-331 (2026)
Taxable costs in supreme court
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Costs in the supreme court shall include:
1. The amount paid to the clerk of that court.
2. The amount paid to the clerk of the superior court for certified copies of the record and for transmitting it.
3. The cost of printing or typing the abstract of record and briefs.
4. The amount paid for the transcript of the notes of the reporter of the superior court.
5. Such other disbursements as may have been incurred pursuant to an order of the court or agreement of the parties.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: In Re Shannon, 876 P.2d 548 (Ariz. 1994).
In Re Shannon, 876 P.2d 548 (Ariz. 1994). “" [12] This provision reads: "The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments, the legislative, executive and judicial, and no person or collection of persons being one of these departments, shall exercise any power properly belonging to…”
Rice v. Brakel, M.D., Ctr. for Neurosciences, 310 P.3d 16 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “Costs ¶ 29 The Center asks for its costs on appeal pursuant to AR.S. § 12-331. We note that on appeal to this court, costs may be recoverable under AR.”
Newman v. Select Specialty Hosp.-Arizona, Inc., 374 P.3d 433 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “See A.R.S. §§ 12-331 to -333 (Title 12 “Courts and Civil Proceedings,” Article 4 “Costs Defined”); Nelson, 207 Ariz.”
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State, 696 P.2d 185 (Ariz. 1985). “3 See A.R.S. §§ 12-331 and 12-332 (definitions of “taxa *108 ble costs”).”
In Re Nelson, 86 P.3d 374 (Ariz. 2004). “A.R.S. § 12-331 (2003). We do not find these provisions helpful in our analysis on this point because disciplinary proceedings are unusual in that review by this court is mandatory.”
Kromko v. Superior Court, 811 P.2d 12 (Ariz. 1991). “8 A.R.S. §§ 12-331, -342. The mere fact that Kromko filed a partially unsuccessful cross-appeal does not affect Miller’s obligation.”
Kadlec v. Dorsey, 223 P.3d 674 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “Disposition ¶ 10 For the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Kadlec and its denial of the Dorseys' motion for partial summary judgment.”
Sweis v. Chatwin, 585 P.2d 269 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978). “” The agreement of the parties as set forth in their contract contains a provision which gives the successful party in this litigation the right to recover reasonable attorney’s fees.”
Grand Canyon Trust v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 107 P.3d 356 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “¶ 46 TEP requests an award of costs pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-331 (2003) and 12-341 (2003).”
Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Action Marine, Inc., 161 P.3d 1248 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “In addition, we award the Randalls costs and attorneys’ fees incurred on appeal in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 12-331, 12-341 (2003) and 12-348(B) (2003), subject to them compliance with Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 21(c).”
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn, 714 P.2d 854 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “2d 79 (1970) (attorney’s fees in promissory note are not costs in the appellate court, *365 A.R.S. § 12-331); Spanier v. United States Fid.”
Nat'l Inv. Co. v. Est. of Bronner, 704 P.2d 268 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “Bronner and his successors in interest precluded from having judgment set aside for not timely filing a motion to set aside?” Appellant contends that the letter of May 13, 1982, did not constitute an appearance, because Bronner did not pay an answering fee as required by A.R.S.…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-331(4) — 1 case
Emp v. Prieto (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.