Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1004 (2026)

Facilitation; classification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A person commits facilitation if, acting with knowledge that another person is committing or intends to commit an offense, the person knowingly provides the other person with means or opportunity for the commission of the offense.

B. This section does not apply to peace officers who act in their official capacity within the scope of their authority and in the line of duty.

C. Facilitation is a:

1. Class 5 felony if the offense facilitated is a class 1 felony.

2. Class 6 felony if the offense facilitated is a class 2 or class 3 felony.

3. Class 1 misdemeanor if the offense facilitated is a class 4 or class 5 felony.

4. Class 3 misdemeanor if the offense facilitated is a class 6 felony or a misdemeanor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: State, Ex Rel. Horne v. Campos, 250 P.3d 201 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State, Ex Rel. Horne v. Campos, 250 P.3d 201 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “¶ 8 On June 16, 2005, Campos pleaded guilty to facilitation of money laundering, a class six undesignated offense in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1004 (2010), -2317 (2010). The conviction stemmed from Noe Auto Sales’s failure to file a Form 8300 2 after receiving more than $10,000…”
State v. Scott, 865 P.2d 792 (Ariz. 1993). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 13-1004. Defendant claims that this was error.”
State v. Gooch, 678 P.2d 946 (Ariz. 1984). · cites it 5× “See A.R.S. § 13-1004. Appellant argues that facilitation is a lesser included offense of the greater offense, second-degree murder [1] and maintains that the state's theory of accomplice liability created a factual predicate for a facilitation instruction.”
State v. Harris, 655 P.2d 1339 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 6× “1 The main issue here is whether the crime of facilitation, A.R.S. § 13-1004, is a lesser- *288 included offense of burglary or theft.”
Bogdanov v. People, 941 P.2d 247 (Colo. 1997). “136, § 6 (amending Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-1004 (1989)) (emphasis added).”
State v. Large, 321 P.3d 439 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” AR.S. § 13-1004(A) (2004). We discern no meaningful difference between furnishing substantial assistance and providing means or opportunity, nor does Large argue that the two are not analogous.”
State v. Politte, 664 P.2d 661 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “Facilitation The appellant Zucker requested that an instruction on the crime of facilitation, A.R.S. § 13-1004 2 be given, claiming it was a lesser included offense of the sale charge.”
State v. Garcia, 860 P.2d 498 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “ANALYSIS LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE INSTRUCTION Defendant requested that the jury be instructed on facilitation as a lesser included offense of aggravated assault.”
Olivas-Motta v. Holder, 746 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2013). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. §§ 13-1004, 13-3405. He concedes that this was a conviction of a CIMT.”
Manuel Olivas-Motta v. Eric Holder, Jr., 716 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-1004 , 13-3405. He concedes that this was a conviction of a CIMT.”
State v. Curry, 931 P.2d 1133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “section 13-1004 (1989). The jury did convict defendant of this charge pursuant to these instructions, and the verdict forms did not require the jury to indicate which mental state it had found.”
State of Arizona v. David Lee Green, 459 P.3d 45 (Ariz. 2020). “” § 13-1004(A). ¶19 Each inchoate offense shares a characteristic with a completed offense.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1004(A) — 8 cases
State v. Scott, 865 P.2d 792 (Ariz. 1993). “See A.R.S. § 13-1004. Defendant claims that this was error.”
State v. Large, 321 P.3d 439 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” AR.S. § 13-1004(A) (2004). We discern no meaningful difference between furnishing substantial assistance and providing means or opportunity, nor does Large argue that the two are not analogous.”
State of Arizona v. David Lee Green, 459 P.3d 45 (Ariz. 2020). “” § 13-1004(A). ¶19 Each inchoate offense shares a characteristic with a completed offense.”
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II, 363 P.3d 120 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
Sara Sanchez-Resendez v. Loretta E. Lynch, 608 F. App'x 537 (9th Cir. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1004(B) — 1 case
In re Christopher R., 957 P.2d 1004 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.