Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1703 (2026)

Arson of a structure or property; classification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A person commits arson of a structure or property by knowingly and unlawfully damaging a structure or property by knowingly causing a fire or explosion.

B. Arson of a structure is a class 4 felony. Arson of property is a class 4 felony if the property had a value of more than one thousand dollars. Arson of property is a class 5 felony if the property had a value of more than one hundred dollars but not more than one thousand dollars. Arson of property is a class 1 misdemeanor if the property had a value of one hundred dollars or less.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic, 265 P.3d 410 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic, 265 P.3d 410 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 5× ““Arson of property is a class 5 felony if the property had a value of more than one hundred dollars but not more than one thousand dollars.”
State v. Greenway, 823 P.2d 22 (Ariz. 1991). · cites it 4× “§ 13-1802 and one count of arson of an unoccupied structure pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1703. Defendant appeals from his convictions and death sentences on the two first degree murder counts pursuant to 17 A.”
State v. Newfield, 778 P.2d 1366 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 8× “” PROCEDURAL HISTORY Newfield was charged by information with arson of a structure, a class 4 felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1703(A). The matter was tried to a jury and at the conclusion of the state’s case, Newfield moved for a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Menard, 888 A.2d 57 (R.I. 2005). · cites it 2× “” Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-1703(A), as amended by P.”
United States v. Javier Velasquez-Reyes, A.K.A. Javier Alvarado-Hernandez, 427 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 2005). “§ 81 ; Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 13-1703 (West 2005); Ark.”
State v. Gatliff, 102 P.3d 981 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “§ 13-1702), arson of a structure (A.R.S. § 13-1703 (2001)), arson of an occupied structure (A.”
State v. Lopez, 323 P.3d 748 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” AR.S. § 13-1703(A). The transferred intent instruction here improperly permitted the jurors to convict without finding every element of the charged offense; they were instructed that they could convict Lopez of knowingly burning an occupied structure simply because he…”
United States v. Velez-Alderete, 569 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2009). “, Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 13-1703 (covering the burning of "a structure or property”); Ark.”
United States v. Mitchell, 218 F. Supp. 3d 360 (M.D. Penn. 2016). · cites it 2× “400-420 ; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 13-1703 to -1704; Cal.”
State v. Nichols, 887 P.2d 586 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Petitioner contends that a dumpster is not a “structure” within the meaning of AR.S. § 13-1703, the statute under which he was convicted.”
State of Arizona v. Edwardo Serrato III (Ariz. 2025). · cites it 15× “An alternative interpretation would render A.R.S. § 13-1703 nearly superfluous and undermine the tiered arson statutory scheme.”
State v. Rosu, 640 P.2d 207 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “On May 17, 1979, the appellant/defendant, Tod John Rosu, was adjudged guilty of arson of an unoccupied structure, a class 4 felony (A.R.S. § 13-1703), and he was placed on probation for a period of four years.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1703(A) — 5 cases
State v. Newfield, 778 P.2d 1366 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). “” PROCEDURAL HISTORY Newfield was charged by information with arson of a structure, a class 4 felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1703(A). The matter was tried to a jury and at the conclusion of the state’s case, Newfield moved for a judgment of acquittal.”
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic, 265 P.3d 410 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). ““Arson of property is a class 5 felony if the property had a value of more than one hundred dollars but not more than one thousand dollars.”
State v. Menard, 888 A.2d 57 (R.I. 2005). “” Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-1703(A), as amended by P.”
State v. Lopez, 323 P.3d 748 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” AR.S. § 13-1703(A). The transferred intent instruction here improperly permitted the jurors to convict without finding every element of the charged offense; they were instructed that they could convict Lopez of knowingly burning an occupied structure simply because he…”
State v. Craft (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1703(B) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic, 265 P.3d 410 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). ““Arson of property is a class 5 felony if the property had a value of more than one hundred dollars but not more than one thousand dollars.”
State of Arizona v. Edwardo Serrato III (Ariz. 2025). “An alternative interpretation would render A.R.S. § 13-1703 nearly superfluous and undermine the tiered arson statutory scheme.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.