Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2307 (2026)

Trafficking in stolen property; classification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A person who recklessly traffics in the property of another that has been stolen is guilty of trafficking in stolen property in the second degree.

B. A person who knowingly initiates, organizes, plans, finances, directs, manages or supervises the theft and trafficking in the property of another that has been stolen is guilty of trafficking in stolen property in the first degree.

C. Trafficking in stolen property in the second degree is a class 3 felony. Trafficking in stolen property in the first degree is a class 2 felony.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 693 P.2d 973 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Johnson, 693 P.2d 973 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 30× “Appellant filed this appeal from his conviction of one count of trafficking in stolen property, a Class 3 felony in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2307, and from his sentence of imprisonment for a term of ten years.”
State v. Mohr, 724 P.2d 1233 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Appellant was charged in Yavapai County with one count of trafficking in stolen property, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-2307(A), and one count of theft, a violation of A.”
Gonzales v. City of Phoenix, 52 P.3d 184 (Ariz. 2002). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 13-2307(A). Theft can occur in various ways.”
State v. Rogowski, 634 P.2d 387 (Ariz. 1981). · cites it 5× “§ 13-1802; and one count of trafficking in stolen property, A.R.S. § 13-2307. We assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.”
State of Arizona v. Glen Leo Gagnon, 340 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 6× “In contrast, § 44-1630 focuses on the act of providing false information to a “pawnbroker, second hand dealer, scrap metal dealer or dealer in precious metals,” such as when Gagnon signed the pawn ticket in this ease.”
State v. DiGiulio, 835 P.2d 488 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3× “…financed, directed, managed or supervised the trafficking in the property of another that had been stolen." Compare A.R.S. § 13-2307(B).”
State of Arizona v. Dominic Rodolpho Flores, 335 P.3d 555 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “” A.R.S. § 13-2307(B). But he has not explained why the jury was required to find the exact manner in which he had committed the trafficking offenses in order for the Kelly factors to be inherent in the verdict and for us to determine whether he committed those offenses on the…”
State v. Adams, 765 P.2d 992 (Ariz. 1988). · cites it 4× “In addition, the state alleged that defendant had prior felony convictions for forgery and burglary and that defendant committed the crimes while on parole.”
State v. Galan, 658 P.2d 243 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “We next turn to a consideration of the trafficking statute, A.R.S. § 13-2307(A) which provides: A person who recklessly traffics in the property of another that has been stolen is guilty of trafficking in stolen property in the second degree.”
State v. Phillips, 678 P.2d 512 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 2312 supports a finding that elements, necessarily found beyond a reasonable doubt in that conviction, are present which would support a conviction under A.R.S. § 13-2307, which prohibits trafficking in stolen property.”
State v. Buchholz, 678 P.2d 488 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 13-2301(B)(1) The appellant argues the instructions pertained only to a charge of trafficking, A.R.S. § 13-2307, yet the appellant agrees that the inference may be used to prove theft.”
State v. Edwards, 739 P.2d 1325 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 13-1802, and one count of trafficking in stolen property, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-2307. Prior to trial, the state alleged that all counts were to be treated as prior convictions to one another, under A.”
Show all 30 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2307(A) — 12 cases
State v. Mohr, 724 P.2d 1233 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). “Appellant was charged in Yavapai County with one count of trafficking in stolen property, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-2307(A), and one count of theft, a violation of A.”
Gonzales v. City of Phoenix, 52 P.3d 184 (Ariz. 2002). “A.R.S. § 13-2307(A). Theft can occur in various ways.”
State v. Johnson, 693 P.2d 973 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “Appellant filed this appeal from his conviction of one count of trafficking in stolen property, a Class 3 felony in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2307, and from his sentence of imprisonment for a term of ten years.”
State of Arizona v. Glen Leo Gagnon, 340 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “In contrast, § 44-1630 focuses on the act of providing false information to a “pawnbroker, second hand dealer, scrap metal dealer or dealer in precious metals,” such as when Gagnon signed the pawn ticket in this ease.”
State v. Adams, 765 P.2d 992 (Ariz. 1988). “In addition, the state alleged that defendant had prior felony convictions for forgery and burglary and that defendant committed the crimes while on parole.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2307(B) — 10 cases
State v. DiGiulio, 835 P.2d 488 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “…financed, directed, managed or supervised the trafficking in the property of another that had been stolen." Compare A.R.S. § 13-2307(B).”
State of Arizona v. Dominic Rodolpho Flores, 335 P.3d 555 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” A.R.S. § 13-2307(B). But he has not explained why the jury was required to find the exact manner in which he had committed the trafficking offenses in order for the Kelly factors to be inherent in the verdict and for us to determine whether he committed those offenses on the…”
State v. Riley, 684 P.2d 896 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
State v. Chan, 935 P.2d 850 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Rogowski, 634 P.2d 387 (Ariz. 1981). “§ 13-1802; and one count of trafficking in stolen property, A.R.S. § 13-2307. We assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2307(C) — 3 cases
State v. Johnson, 693 P.2d 973 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “Appellant filed this appeal from his conviction of one count of trafficking in stolen property, a Class 3 felony in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2307, and from his sentence of imprisonment for a term of ten years.”
State of Arizona v. Glen Leo Gagnon, 340 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “In contrast, § 44-1630 focuses on the act of providing false information to a “pawnbroker, second hand dealer, scrap metal dealer or dealer in precious metals,” such as when Gagnon signed the pawn ticket in this ease.”
State v. Hamlet (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.