A. A person commits refusing to assist in fire control if:
1. Upon a reasonable command by a person reasonably known to be a fireman, such person knowingly refuses to aid in extinguishing a fire or in protecting property at the scene of a fire; or
2. Upon command by a person reasonably known to be a fireman or peace officer, such person knowingly disobeys an order or regulation relating to the conduct of persons in the vicinity of a fire.
B. In this section, "fireman" means any officer of the fire department, the state forester or his deputies or any other person vested by law with the duty to extinguish fires.
C. A person who complies with this section by assisting in fire control shall not be held liable to any person for damages resulting therefrom, if such person acted reasonably under the circumstances known to him at the time.
D. Refusing to assist in fire control is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1994–2020 · leading case:
State v. Buhman, 887 P.2d 582 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Buhman, 887 P.2d 582 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 13-2404(A)(2) (emphasis added). The troubling distinction in this case is that criminal culpability under section 12-2458 does not turn on reasonableness of conduct or state of mind or on facts reasonably known or ascertainable; rather, it turns on nonpayment of a…”
Manriquez v. Superior, Town of (D. Ariz. 2020).
“Count II: Illegal Search 26 Defendants argue that Manriquez’s conviction also bars Count II, the illegal search 27 claim, because § 13-2404(A)(1) requires that officers be “engaged in a lawful government 28 operation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2404(A)(1) — 1 case
Manriquez v. Superior, Town of (D. Ariz. 2020).
“Count II: Illegal Search 26 Defendants argue that Manriquez’s conviction also bars Count II, the illegal search 27 claim, because § 13-2404(A)(1) requires that officers be “engaged in a lawful government 28 operation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2404(A)(2) — 1 case
State v. Buhman, 887 P.2d 582 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994).
“” A.R.S. § 13-2404(A)(2) (emphasis added). The troubling distinction in this case is that criminal culpability under section 12-2458 does not turn on reasonableness of conduct or state of mind or on facts reasonably known or ascertainable; rather, it turns on nonpayment of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.