Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-302

Criminal liability based upon conduct

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person may be guilty of an offense committed by such person's own conduct or by the conduct of another for which such person is criminally accountable as provided in this chapter, or both.  In any prosecution, testimony of an accomplice need not be corroborated.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 155 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1962–2024 · leading case: State v. Rose
State v. Rose (1978) ariz · cites it 12× “Defendant asserts this was inadmissible. This Court does not agree.”
State v. Watson (1978) ariz · cites it 8× “…was convicted by a jury trial of murder in the first degree, A.R.S. §§ 13-451, 452; armed burglary and burglary, A.R.S. § 13-302; robbery, §§ 13-641, 643; theft of a motor vehicle, A.R.S. § 13-672; and obstructing justice, A.R.S. § 13-541. Defendant *444 was sentenced to…”
State v. Reid (1976) ariz · cites it 8× “§§ 13-641 and 643; armed burglary, A.R.S. § 13-302; robbery, A.R.S. § 13-641; burglary, A.”
State v. Hinden (2010) arizctapp · cites it 3× “38, § 1 (former A.R.S. § 13-302(A), the precursor statute to § 13-1501(4), specifically itemizing “construction materials” as commercial items); see also State v.”
State v. Rodriguez (1977) ariz · cites it 4× “GORDON, Justice: Appellant, Richard Amine Rodriguez, and co-defendant Keith Edward Cook (not a party to this appeal) were each convicted of burglary, second degree, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-302, involving a dwelling in Tempe, Arizona.”
State v. Grijalva (1975) ariz · cites it 6× “Frank Ares Daniel Grijalva was found guilty by a jury and sentenced on the following counts; (1) first degree armed burglary in violation of ARS § 13-302, not less than 5 nor more than 10 years in the Arizona State Prison; (2) first degree rape, ARS § 13-611, not less than 20…”
State v. Janise (1977) ariz · cites it 4× “This is an appeal from a conviction for second degree burglary, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-302. Appellant’s counsel submitted briefs as required by Anders v.”
State v. Gretzler (1980) ariz · cites it 2× “Defendant, Douglas Gretzler, was charged in two indictments by a Pima County grand jury with one count of burglary, A.R.S. § 13-302; one count of kidnapping for robbery with a gun, A.”
State v. Ferreira (1981) ariz · cites it 4× “1, 1978, A.R.S. §§ 13-302(A), (C), 13-108, 13-110, 13-611(A), 13-614(A), (C), 13-1647, 13-303, 13-1649.”
State v. Lujan (1979) ariz · cites it 2× “§ 13 — 452, 1 and burglary of the first degree, A.R.S. § 13-302. Defendant was sentenced to fourteen to fifteen years imprisonment for burglary, and he was sentenced to death for murder.”
State v. Watson (1982) ariz · cites it 2× “After a jury trial, appellant Michael Steven Watson was convicted of burglary under former A.R.S. § 13-302, assault with a deadly weapon, former A.”
State v. Jerousek (1979) ariz · cites it 2× “2d 399 (1965) as representing an analogous requirement for the crime of burglary, A.R.S. § 13-302. If the finding of guilt is to sustain burglary in the nighttime, and, therefore, the greater permissible sentence, this finding must be expressed by the jury in its verdict.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-302(A) — 11 cases
State v. Hinden (2010) arizctapp “38, § 1 (former A.R.S. § 13-302(A), the precursor statute to § 13-1501(4), specifically itemizing “construction materials” as commercial items); see also State v.”
State v. Ferreira (1981) ariz “1, 1978, A.R.S. §§ 13-302(A), (C), 13-108, 13-110, 13-611(A), 13-614(A), (C), 13-1647, 13-303, 13-1649.”
State v. Geiger (1976) ariz
State v. Barr (1977) arizctapp
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-302(B) — 5 cases
State v. Geiger (1976) ariz
State v. Scrivner (1979) arizctapp
State v. Tramble (1977) arizctapp
State v. Reese (1976) arizctapp
State v. Quintana (1962) ariz
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-302(C) — 2 cases
State v. Ferreira (1981) ariz “1, 1978, A.R.S. §§ 13-302(A), (C), 13-108, 13-110, 13-611(A), 13-614(A), (C), 13-1647, 13-303, 13-1649.”
State v. Castaneda (1974) ariz
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.